The answer to the #1 question I'm getting to this thread...
Who ended up with the servers? Was it the good guys or the bad guys?
Here's why I personally think #PatriotsAreNowInControl
THREAD 👇🏻
Who ended up with the servers? Was it the good guys or the bad guys?
Here's why I personally think #PatriotsAreNowInControl
THREAD 👇🏻
https://twitter.com/orijonal/status/1327277595583414274
NOTE: Some of this is conjecture. The other thread is all sourced and fact - this includes my personal opinions.
#1: Good guys protect evidence - bad guys destroy it.
Remember the "water main break" that ruined absentee ballots in GA? Yeah, that's bad guy 101.
The details aren't clear on this story yet, but it sounds like we recovered the goods - bad guys don't do that.
Remember the "water main break" that ruined absentee ballots in GA? Yeah, that's bad guy 101.
The details aren't clear on this story yet, but it sounds like we recovered the goods - bad guys don't do that.
#2: Trump was prepared for this.
Trump's known the election would be a sham for months. Q tells us that their "Playbook Is Known".
Don't you think with a hella good team, a known playbook and a lot of time, you'd be able to prepare countermoves for your opponent's attacks?
Trump's known the election would be a sham for months. Q tells us that their "Playbook Is Known".
Don't you think with a hella good team, a known playbook and a lot of time, you'd be able to prepare countermoves for your opponent's attacks?
#3: The Army's use is good for Trump.
(It's not clear that it WAS the Army, but if it is...)
3-A: Trump has loyalty with the military whereas he's always at odds with the CIA. Even Esper followed his moves when he questioned Trump's decisions.
(It's not clear that it WAS the Army, but if it is...)
3-A: Trump has loyalty with the military whereas he's always at odds with the CIA. Even Esper followed his moves when he questioned Trump's decisions.
3-B: IF the Army was used, that hints that it was against the CIA.
Think about it, if we were attacking a CIA facility, we couldn't very well use the CIA could we?
Think about it, if we were attacking a CIA facility, we couldn't very well use the CIA could we?
3-C: IF it was the Army, we wouldn't be able to deploy them on German soil unless...
Unless we were ACTUALLY on American soil - The Frankfurt Consulate.
Unless we were ACTUALLY on American soil - The Frankfurt Consulate.
#4: Trump's public criticism of CIA Director Gina Halspel is likely founded in issues deeper than her unwillingness to declassify docs.
If Trump realized that CIA resources were being used in the Election Coup, that would give him a lot more reason to take issue with Halspel.
If Trump realized that CIA resources were being used in the Election Coup, that would give him a lot more reason to take issue with Halspel.
If the purpose of this campaign is to spark the great awakening and put the deep-state in the light, what better way than to take a dump in Gina Halspel's backyard with his Army buddies.
#5: Trump appointed a computer guy to Defense Secretary
The timing of this is too crazy to not be related.
Really? A few days after an international snatch-and-grab of mega-sophisticated election-tampering computers and the new SOD has nothing to do with it?
Not buying it...
The timing of this is too crazy to not be related.
Really? A few days after an international snatch-and-grab of mega-sophisticated election-tampering computers and the new SOD has nothing to do with it?
Not buying it...
Chris Miller's asymmetric cyber warfare experience (whatever TF that is) is the reason he's leading the pentagon right now.
Being a former Green Beret and performing the duties of asst. sec. of defense for spec ops and low-intensity conflict doesn't hurt the resume either.
Being a former Green Beret and performing the duties of asst. sec. of defense for spec ops and low-intensity conflict doesn't hurt the resume either.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
