A few people sent me this recent story about the @latimes agreeing to pay out a $3 million settlement for pay discrimination based on race and gender. latimes.com/entertainment-…
I was not part of that case.
But I have been petitioning a similar pay discrimination case, because I make much less than my white or male colleagues.
I was told I would get an answer to my grievance last week.
I cleared my Friday afternoon to be around for the call: Nothing.
Then I was told an @latimes lawyer would provide me with an official answer by today.
Nothing.
Yes, I am grateful to be here. Yes, I am grateful to have a job.
I grew up without money; I do not take these things for granted.
But the law is clear on this: It is not legal to pay me so much less because I am a woman; or because I am Chicana; or because, as I was told many times, during my job interview "nobody knows who you are";
or because my mother does not speak English; or because my surname is "weird"; or because my parents picked oranges; or for whatever other reasons you contrive to make sense of this embarrassingly huge pay gap.
Every single day I remember how I was asked at my job interview if my parents came to this country illegally.
Every single day I remember how my previous two previous editors made me feel unimportant, small, a no-name workhorse.
And I think about how I would feel if anyone dared treat my daughter that way.
I will happily fight like hell for as long as it takes, because even if I lose, at least I tried to make the world a little better for her.
Wish me luck, Twitter fam! It's getting real. 🙏🏽💛
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Last night, after nearly 6 anxious months of being told "the company will have a response for you shortly," my employer, @latimes, finally handed me a decision on the pay discrimination claim I filed through my union.
The two-page memo that @latimes sent me yesterday was extremely painful to read.
In the memo, the L.A. Times said I am not worth the same as my male or white colleagues.
The letter says I deserve to make only two-thirds of what my co-critic is paid -- even though we have the exact same job responsibilities -- because I do not bring prestige to the paper, and because the company says our job classifications aren't the same.