In a mere whimper, one of the world’s most notorious tyrants and oldest dictators just died. Here’s a snapshot of his life of crime and savagery.. [Thread]
Khalifa bin Salman Al Khalifa (KBS) was the longest running Prime Minister in the world. Along with his brother (and now his nephew) he ruled Bahrain with an iron fist for 50 years! In classic mafia tradition, he amassed a massive fortune, partly by extorting all capital ventures
He was infamously dubbed “Khalifa 50/50” as he demanded an equal share in major investments and government contracts, which allowed him to build his business empire that spanned multiple countries, including Thailand - his “second home”.
Extorting the largely impoverished people of the island nation was only the tip of this hideous iceberg. He was notorious for persecuting dissenting voices, in particular, the country’s Shi’a population, who despite comprising the majority, were treated as second class citizens.
He was also one of the chief engineers of the ‘sectarian cleansing’ campaign of Bahrain, a top secret project aimed at upending the demographic composition of the nation to ensure the Shi’a were no longer the majority.
By granting instant citizenship en masse to tens of thousands of foreigners, the project was intended to upend the ethnic and religious balance of the country, where the Shi’a comprised over %80 of the population for centuries.
But KBS’s worst crimes were overseeing the country’s vicious onslaught against the people (mostly Shi’a, but also Sunnis) who demanded their basic rights in his family’s totalitarian dictatorship.
In a country with a population of about one million, hundreds have been killed and thousands imprisoned for political dissent. The regime used the sectarian card to brutally crackdown on Shi’a activists and has widely documented cases of unspeakable torture for many decades.
There are countless people living under poverty in Bahrain, and thousands, including religious scholars and human rights campaigners behind bars, where insults to Shi’a beliefs and figures are part of the torment endured in the country’s notorious incarcerations.
Similar to Saddam era crackdowns, even Shi’a religious symbols like flags that honor Imam Hussein or somber processions are banned. Such religious symbols are publicly torn down and those that display them are persecuted by the infamously sectarian security apparatus.
KBS justified his murderous campaign to his Western backers by accusing the Shi’a of being proxies of Iran. This despite the fact that Shias in Bahrain (and their plights) predate modern Iran, and their pleas were rooted in legitimate grievances rather than transnational politics
Our scholars insist that the world’s Shi’a community has two responsibilities here:
1. Not take our faith for granted and use the freedom to express our religious identity and engage in our rites & rituals with pride, as those in Bahrain are deprived of this honor.
2. To stand in solidarity with our brothers & sisters in Bahrain (and neighboring Saudi Arabia) and sympathize with their pain and oppression. Imam Ali says helping those in despair and relieving their pain “is compensation for the greatest sins..” — Nahjul Balagha, maxim #24
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We could never do justice to the Prophet, especially while the Exalted Lord has said, “And you possess an exalted character.” وإنك لعلى خلق عظيم [68:4]) but this is a and perfunctory thread on the #HolyProphet Mohammad and some of his angelic features:
He came with a divine mandate to purify the soul, revive the intellect, and guide humanity toward its Creator, all without ever taking the slightest advantage or enriching himself. In fact, when offered, he repeatedly said, “I ask you not for any compensation..” #ProphetOfMercy
The pagans tried everything to stop him from preaching his message: they first promised him every imaginable pleasure, and he refused. They threatened him, yet he did not budge. Then began a campaign of intimidation, sanctions, torture and murder of his followers & friends.
Many misinterpret the statement of Lady Zainab, “I saw nothing but beauty” as some kind of mystical esoteric code, or a reference to ghastly monstrosity. Not quite.
Context is key. It‘s in response to a question posed by the tyrant: “How did you see God’s actions toward you?”
What this means is obvious: insofar as the crimes of the Umayyads, they are the greatest and most heinous anyone has ever seen. But in the eyes of this holy saint, God is exalted from the actions of the wicked ones. What He does to His righteous creatures is beautiful in the end.
She isn’t referring to the heart-wrenching and macabre massacre of the Prophet’s family, which is worthy of the tears of angels and the heavens for eternity. Nothing about that was beautiful or good. In a way, she’s refuting the deterministic fatalism implied in his question.
The skin color of divine guides or prophets does not matter. Because racism is a form of arrogance, it is a despicable trait and God tests our faith with it. And since very community suffers from it, one way or another, it must be eliminated
Our 9th Imam, al-Jawad is described as “dark-skinned”, and despite not being black, some found it challenging to believe in him because of his skin color. Add that to the Imam’s very young age (he was just 8 years old), it was a difficult test for some of the people of his time.
Again, the Imam’s complexion does not matter, except for identification purposes. This is why the Imams provided descriptions of him. Another reason these features are specified could be for obfuscation and to draw authorities away, which may explain apparent contradictions.
Look at verses 6 & 7 in Sura al-Dhuha and how they’re translated (most English translations are the same on this point). Notice how the translations (and comments in brackets) seem to contradict the Prophet’s infallibility; he was orphaned & lost then guided.. [1/6]
That apparent contradiction has caused much debate and confusion, and has even led Sunni Muslims to unanimously claim that his infallibility does not extend to the period prior to being appointed as messenger, or worse, that it is limited to his message only.
Shi’a scholars have maintained the absolute infallibility of all prophets, in a way that’s in line even with these verses. Books like Sharif al-Murtadha’s Tanzih al Anbiya were authored to do just that. What is very interesting is how the Imams of the Shi’a interpret these verses
🔸 Eminent scholars who were buried in their libraries [thread]
1️⃣ Allamah Abdul Hussein Amini, author of the al-Ghadeer Encyclopedia, chose to be buried at his library in the holy city of Najaf. He is said to have reviewed 100,000 books/manuscripts to compile his magnum opus.
His library now boasts over 500,000 books, including a collection of rare manuscripts, available to the public.
After al-Ghadeer (translated to Urdu by Syed Akhtar Rizvi), Allamah Amini write an autobiographical appendix on his travels in a quest to compile the encyclopedia.
An English biography of Allamah Amini was published recently, entitled Devoted to the Truth, which is a translation of his biography in Farsi
Today marks the passing of Sheikh Shaltout, dean of Al-Azhar who issued a groundbreaking fatwa recognising the Shi’a faith as the 5th Islamic sect. The edict (attached) followed correspondence with Sayed Sharafuddin, under the direction of Ayatollah Borujerdy [thread]
The correspondence was later compiled in the book al Muraja’at in which major doctrinal differences of the Shi’a school were discussed by Sharafuddin, convincing Shaltout that Shi’a weren’t heretics as previously assumed. The book is found here: al-islam.org/al-murajaat-ab…
Sharafuddin, a pioneering scholar from south Lebanon, was an ardent promoter of positive interfaith dialogue - in that he advocated open discussion between Shi’a and Sunni. He was invited by King Husain to lead prayers at Masjid al Haram in Makkah, despite being Shi’a!