In an ideological battle, you can defeat the other.
In an electoral one, you need to win them over.
While electoral battles do have an ideological component.
they are not entirely or even mainly ideological battles.
If we consider people who voted for the opponent as our enemy, then we are fighting an ideological battle.
But based on a wrong data. Their voting preference.
And if we continue to treat them as our enemy, then we are only helping to consolidate the current power position.
Just because we are on this side and they are on that side doesn't mean we assume intellectual superiority.
Bridges need to be laid.
It needs to be conveyed as to why it is better here.
And then make it easier to come to this side.
Not chide them for being there till now.
Those bridges are conversations.
Be it virtual gatherings or the real ones.
Everyone who opposes us or criticises us is not a troll or an IT cell agent.
Even if they are, the person behind that account is a fellow citizen. And every fellow citizen is worth engaging with.
People who are fighting an ideological battle can dismiss them as trolls. As a waste of time and energy. Though I hope even we don't do that.
But for the people who are fighting an electoral battle, it is imperative that they engage with the people from the other side.
For that one incremental vote from the person from the other camp is what will win you the election.
And one doesn't need to forego their ideology for this.
All that you need is to not treat them as enemies. Not make it difficult for them to change sides.
We are on two sides of a river.
We need more people to come this side.
Let there be bridges. Let there be boats.
Talk to own side to keep them here.
Talk to others to get them here.
Make the journey and destination smooth.
Be it on twitter or in that booth.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Dear PM @narendramodi, here is a collection of "The worst is over" ft that you pulled off year after year. Imagine being able to say that every year and people believing it every year.
Here. This is 2017. The year after de-monster-stroke.
Beginning of 2018, and I think here economic survey guys honestly thought the worst was over.
But they underestimated the power of a stupid man in power. Yeah. That's you dear PM @narendramodi.
By end of 2018, some of your ministers were seriously hoping for that proverbial light at the end of the tunnel. Without realising that the light will come only if you move towards it.
We can't expect light if we are digging a grave and not a tunnel.
The way we framed rules was very 'Modi'ish. That neighbours would need to take an approval route for investing in India. Without taking the name of China.
With that what we also conveyed that we put China and Pakistan in a similar category. As a hostile or an enemy nation. 2/n
For China, a limited skirmish with India would have always been on the table as an extension of their diplomacy. Considering the infrastructural advantage, historical disputes and distance from mainland, this was a region they could always pick to fight. 3/n
"Only Gandhis can hold INC together." is a statement often thrown around, repeated saying of which, is expected to validate its own assertion.
To analyse this question a bit impartially, first you have to ask whether INC has held itself together. 1/n
Let's start from 1997, when Mrs Gandhi came into active politics. A split happened around the same time.
1. In 1998, Mamata Banerjee, a congress leader, split from the party and made Trinamul Congress. She governs West Bengal now. Marginal presence of INC in the state now.
2. In 1999, Sharad Pawar split from INC specifically due to the rift with Mrs Gandhi and made NCP.
NCP is a major political party on its own right in Maharashtra now.
You make use of him like a bt constable. But he is actually National Security Advisor. 1/n
What is NSA?
Well, wiki says, “NSA is tasked with advising the PM on all matters relating to internal & external threats and opportunities to India... The NSA receives all intelligence reports and co-ordinates them to present before the Prime Minister.“ 2/n
And what is national security?
Well, national security is not just territorial security, but includes non-military dimensions, including security from terrorism, economic threats, energy threats, environmental threats, resource threats, cyber threats, pandemic threats etc. 3/n
Impossible to not look back and see what was going through my mind then.
And more importantly whether my acts since then has justified my own decision.
Have to thank twitter here. August 2019 TL gives me a glimpse to my own thoughts back then. Long thread. 1/n
September was a month of taking questions and finding answers. Key learning was that dismissing questions that we found senseless is how we reached here.
Ranging from what about Kashmiri Pandits to didn't you resign because you were about to be fired for misconduct. 2/n
September was also the first month of what was to be an incessant travel. Had a belief that it is important to have a conversation on what we are doing in Kashmir not with just those in Delhi, but to people of the country at large. It was also a month of feeling helpless. 3/n