I've been looking at the new EO from the Kaiserreich Herr Whitmer, and have come up with a few questions.
1) The EO references the Supreme Court ruling from 5Oct2020, "While the court ruled unanimously against Gov. Whitmer’s use of the 1976 act, the court was split with a
1) The EO references the Supreme Court ruling from 5Oct2020, "While the court ruled unanimously against Gov. Whitmer’s use of the 1976 act, the court was split with a
majority of 4-3 on the decision regarding the 1945 EPGA." The reference was only for the dissention of the split decision. How can the minority decision, be their legal basis for this new EO?
2) The Public Health Act 368 of 1978 section 333.2226(d) states "Exercise authority and
2) The Public Health Act 368 of 1978 section 333.2226(d) states "Exercise authority and
promulgate rules to safeguard properly the public health; to prevent the spread of diseases and the existence of sources of contamination; and to implement and carry out the powers and duties vested by law in the department." Where and who has defined this exactly?
3) After
3) After
the Supreme Court ruling 5Oct2020, Herr Whitmer ordered EO No. 2020-184. If we follow the EPA of 1976, which limits the EO to 28 days, shouldn't this have expired thus giving no basis or legal standing for the MHHS EO that takes effect on the 18th, since there has not been l
egislation to extend the "health emergency"?
4) When did viruses start using google calendar? If this was anything but political, then it should go into effect now rather than later as virus dont go by appointments.
4) When did viruses start using google calendar? If this was anything but political, then it should go into effect now rather than later as virus dont go by appointments.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
