You can now add a similar suit in Wisconsin to this list, making it four cases in the past hour that have been voluntarily dismissed.
Each of these suits was similarly structured. "Ordinary voters" filed them claiming that the certification of the vote in key counties should be stopped b/c of election irregularities.
It seems like a reorganization of legal strategy.
All of these cases were either filed or were overseen by James Bopp Jr., a conservative lawyer from Indiana who also once served as a top official of the Republican National Committee.
Bopp declined to comment in a brief interview.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alan Feuer

Alan Feuer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @alanfeuer

17 Nov
NEW: Wow.
US Justice Department under AG William Barr is dropping charges against Salvador Cienfuegos, ex-defense minister of Mexico so that he can be charged in Mexico.

justice.gov/opa/pr/joint-s…
Image
Federal judge in Brooklyn orders the unsealing of sealed papers presumably related to DOJ's decision to drop charges against Cienfuegos.
Read 5 tweets
17 Nov
New:
It's official.
Rudy has been approved to appear in the Pennsylvania election case. Image
If all goes according to schedule, we're moments from beginning the hearing in Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar (the PA secretary of state).
A quick cast of characters:
The judge is Matthew Brann, who was appointed by President Obama in 2012. Before taking the bench Judge Brann was a lawyer in private practice and, interestingly, a Republican party official in Pennsylvania.
Read 69 tweets
17 Nov
New: Here's a quick look at what to expect at this afternoon's federal election case hearing in Pennsylvania--and at the legal snafus the case has already been through.
nytimes.com/live/2020/11/1…
The Trump's campaign chief argument here is that PA elections officials violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution.
The reason? In some Dem counties, officials alerted voters that their mail-in ballots needed fixing while that didn't happen in some GOP counties.
Lawyers for the Dems have countered:
It's not the fault of Dem counties that allowed voters to fix (or "cure") their ballots if GOP counties didn't do that.
They argue that the Trump campaign should have sued those counties but did not.
Read 4 tweets
17 Nov
Lawyers for the Trump campaign's Pennsylvania lawsuit have withdrawn from the case on the eve of the first hearing in the case.
This move follows the withdrawal on Friday of the lawyers who initially filed the suit. Image
With no lawyers left to argue its case, the Trump case has asked the judge to postpone tomorrow's hearing... Image
Ouch.
The federal judge overseeing the PA case, Matthew Brann, has just denied the Trump campaign's request to delay tomorrow's hearing.
It will go on as scheduled. Image
Read 7 tweets
16 Nov
Here is a photo of the red-lined complaint cutting out the count the president is saying is still there.

The amended complaint was filed by a Trump campaign lawyer last night: 20-cv-02078, Middle District PA, docket entry 125.
There is a mention of the observer issue in the introduction to the suit. (See below.)
But the issue is not brought up in the section alleging counts of the complaint.
Which is to say, those section that require proving.
Here, for example, is the amended complaint's first count: It seeks relief for disparate treatment of ballot in different counties.
Read 5 tweets
16 Nov
Later this morning (11:30 EST), there will be a hearing in Green Bay, WI about yet another GOP lawsuit challenging the integrity of the presidential race.
Before it starts, here’s a quick primer on the case.

nytimes.com/live/2020/11/1…
CAUSE & RELIEF
The suit claims problems w/absentee & mail in ballots in 3 WI counties deprived some voters (presumably GOP voters) of equal rights under the constitution. It seeks to enjoin certification of the vote in those counties, a strategy also being tried in PA, MI & GA.
PLAINTIFFS
The suit was filed on behalf of three voters—Michael Langenhorst, Michael LeMay and Stephen Fifrick—by True the Vote Inc., a conservative legal group apparently based in Texas.
Here is the mission statement from their website.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!