The messaging really ought to be the truth, which is:

*We can't afford to not take care of sick people anymore.
*We can't afford to not house the houseless anymore.
*We can't afford a population crushed by debt.
*We can't afford our carceral state.
*America can't afford cruelty.
Our obsession with ignorant cruelty is not only morally empty, it's *expensive.*

The cost of student debt and medical debt, of houselessness, of incarceration as a growth industry, the loss of life, is expensive.

It's VERY expensive.

America can't afford cruelty anymore.
We are quite aware that there are people who would rather die themselves than see sick people they deem undeserving receive care, but that sort of cruel selfishness is the sort of luxury item only afforded to late-stage Roman emperors, and we can't afford that nonsense anymore.
It is SO MUCH MORE expensive to punish people into unlivable lives than it is to simply ... make their lives livable.

We are well aware that there are people who only feel safe and secure when others are suffering, but we cannot afford that level of cruelty anymore.
Refusing to ban fracking is wasteful government spending.

Refusing to cancel student debt is wasteful government spending.

Propping up the corporate prison industry with punitive laws & enforcement is wasteful government spending.

We can't afford cruelty anymore.
Having billionaires is a cruel and wasteful luxury item that we've tolerated for too long. We can't afford them anymore.

We're going to need to tax them and use that money on the things that any sustainable country needs.

It's called "personal accountability."
Conservatism is wasteful, selfish, cruel, and expensive; the national equivalent of buying a sports car with grocery money.

We can't afford it anymore. It's time for a bit of prudence and accountability.

No more wasteful government spending from conservatives.
You want to maintain student debt? Well how are you going to PAY for that?

You don't want transformative climate change policy? How are you going to PAY for that?

You want no universal national health care? How are you going to PAY for that?

We can't afford ignorant cruelty.
You want to maintain police forces in every city? How are you going to PAY?

You want millions of citizens imprisoned? How are you going to PAY?

You want to let our infrastructure crumble? How are you going to PAY?

Nobody talks about how they're going to pay for their cruelty.
Injustice is unjust and unsustainable, and for many of us that's enough. We'd actually pay more to have a sustainable justice, if that's what it took.

But the reality is, sustainability costs *less* than unsustainability—which is sort of obvious if you think about it.
It's time for those of us who actually care about justice and sustainability to reject the arguments of those who want unsustainable injustice on their own terms:

We're very sorry, but your ignorant unsustainable cruelty is irresponsibly expensive.

We can't afford it anymore.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with A.R. Moxon

A.R. Moxon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JuliusGoat

18 Nov
Having half the country refuse to exist in observable reality simply isn't sustainable.

We are going to have to take dramatic remedy as a matter of survival—both for those of us who acknowledge reality and those who won't.
The fact that half the country thinks it's good to drive the bus off the cliff isn't relevent.

The fact that they don't think it will kill them isn't relevant.

The fact that some of them are licensed bus drivers isn't relevant.

What IS important is we mustn't let them do that.
The fact that they think that we want to destroy the bus by refusing to drive off the cliff really doesn't matter, beyond the fact that it tells us they are disconnected from basic reality.

If they do that, they will die. And so will we.

They think only we will die.
Read 6 tweets
18 Nov
DEEP

Boyd prefers the burglary.

High-end merchandise, highly technical thefts, no tracks left, no evidence created. In quick, out quick. The occasional picking of a particular prosperous pocket.
The job at the cannery keeps the authorities from sniffing out the secret job, while the secret job keeps him flush.
But his third occupation keeps him sane, sets him apart.

Occupation number three is writer
Yes, the litterateur of Loony Island, the keeper of its flame, the immortalizer of its story, air father, the artistic sheen of the word made real in the flesh of the cranium, ah! It’s occupation number three he lives for. It’s his inner glory. It’s his secret strength.
Read 33 tweets
18 Nov
Mitch McConnell’s Senate has effectively broken our government.

The Senate is a part of the government in the same way a deadly intestinal blockage is a part of the body.
We aren't witnessing a failed coup. We are witnessing a successful coup that has momentarily lost its grip on the presidency, and which clearly intends to use extra-legal means to try to get it back, and to negate it for however long it doesn't have it.
It's a negation coup.

A coup of the judiciary by only appointing judges when they control the appointment.

A coup of the House by refusing to pass bills.

A coup of everything else through vote suppression and gerrymandering, and now outright thievery.

It's a coup.
Read 13 tweets
17 Nov
As you're probably aware if you follow me on here, my novel comes out in paperback on December 1.

From now until then, I'll be sharing a passage every day.

This is a thread of them.

First: the priest and the flickering man.
Next: the bodyguard, her donut shop, and her pride of ownership.
Read 5 tweets
17 Nov
FOUNTAIN

The Love Party came west in 1787, to make their fortune in the new-formed Northwest Territory.
The “Love Party,” so named after Isaac Love. A bachelor smith and former corporal in the Colonial army, he quickly proved the most capable among them, and a natural leader besides.
The group, setting out from Raleigh, targeting Cincinnati, was made up of a loose and unaffiliated kit of families and fortune hunters, without head or government, but when the guide they hired took ill early in their trip, they found themselves in early danger of failure.
Read 41 tweets
16 Nov
I'm this weird guy who thinks that if you remove a massive unjust crushing burden from the shoulders of millions and millions of people, there will also be a lot of joy, so who give a fuck what selfish self-defeating assholes think.
We're aware that there are those who would rather people suffering under a terrible needless construct that is wearing away at almost every aspect of our national fabric, than see one person get a single dollar they personally feel that person didn't deserve.

And fuck them.
We are going to have to solve our problems without the permission or approval of people who want those problems to exist, and their bullshit selfish reasons for wanting the problems to exist do not constitute a valid argument for having problems exist.

Repeat, repeat repeat.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!