Claims have been circulating about possible bot and foreign disinformation activity, so I wanted to see what the data show.
Step 1: Download tweets from Twitter's Search API containing the first ten words of the tweet. This yielded 1,509 tweets covering a little over a week. (This excludes anything deleted in the last week.)
Step 2: Plot tweets per hour. The big spikes on 11/9 and 11/16 are possible indicators of coordination, though not definitive.
Step 3: Tally top tweeting users. It's clear that many users tweeted this message multiple times, which may imply a disinformation-like objective.
Interestingly, some of these users appear to be Russian-style political sockpuppets, while others mostly tweet about soccer or K-pop. Anyone have any idea what's going on here?
Step 4: Tally most-mentioned users. Lots of political operators here, although I question the logic of aiming an obvious chain letter at them?
Step 5: Plot account creation dates. Although many accounts were created in the past few months, many have been around for much longer. This suggests some may not be influence operators.
Step 6: Plot top emigration destinations. Interesting that English is only the primary language in two locations, one of which is Alaska (clearly a joke).
So my main conclusion is that some of this likely was disinformation, but some may have been real people jumping in as a joke. It's not always easy to tell the difference.
If you have suggestions for other analyses to run, let me know and I'll do them if they're simple enough. Also any alternative interpretations are welcome!
The most interesting finding here might be the thin line between disinfo and viral internet jokes. Major research implications in both areas
Anyone know of research on real accounts that are hacked and later become bots? I've only heard anecdotes; curious whether it's a systematic tactic...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let me separate out several distinct points: 1. Misinfo is probably not going to sway the election. Yes, it is scary that foreign interests are trying to manipulate us. Luckily, that kind of manipulation is extremely difficult to pull off.
2. The most impactful disinfo likely comes from American elites--politicians, talking heads, Twitter micropundits. They have large, trusting audiences. That's a big reason for the 38-point partisan split in confidence in vote-by-mail 11alive.com/article/news/p…
Public opinion on BLM has skyrocketed over the past two weeks, but BLM hasn't changed its tactics much over the past six years. Thoughts on what's changed? nyti.ms/2UtVaOL
Also, here's a fun pop quiz: can you guess the only group for whom BLM support declined over the past two weeks? (Answer in article.)
I imagine respondents might say much of this decline has to do with riots. I can't imagine communicating civilly with such a person.