1/ A few months ago, I had an online run-in with @EoinHiggins_, a left-wing writer. It has since taken a rather bizarre turn. Thread:
@EoinHiggins_ 2/ It began in August, when I wrote a column arguing that Trump’s authoritarianism is an outgrowth of a deeper trend within his party. It’s a theme I’ve been making over and over throughout the Trump era: nymag.com/intelligencer/…
@EoinHiggins_ 3/ Higgins wrote a piece citing it, claiming I argued Trump “is an aberration within the Republican party--a bug, not a feature.” newrepublic.com/article/159158…
@EoinHiggins_ 4/ Of course that is literally 100% the complete opposite of my point. We’ve all been misread from time to time but it’s rare for a professional writer to be that utterly illiterate. When Higgins refused to concede his error, I called him a “nincompoop.”
@EoinHiggins_ 5/ Anyway, now Higgins has a piece in the left-wing media criticism organ “FAIR” arguing that my wife Robin’s work, as a consultant to government education agencies, “would appear to violate the code of ethics of New York‘s parent company”. fair.org/home/new-yorks…
@EoinHiggins_ 6/ Higgins contacted New York’s editors, who explained that it is not a conflict of interest and he does not understand our policy:
@EoinHiggins_ 7/ This explanation has bounced right off him. Higgins asserts in his story that “influencing government policy” somehow IS “part of her job, much like a lobbyist or activist does.”
@EoinHiggins_ 8/ I don’t know what to say to this. Robin’s job is offering technical assistance to states and state education bodies. She is in absolutely no way involved in influencing public policy. It’s pure fabrication.
@EoinHiggins_ 9/ I don’t even understand how Higgins got this idea from her job description, except that he clearly has enormous difficulty reading words and drawing meaning from them.
@EoinHiggins_ 10/ Also, Robin Chait and I can both confirm the photo of “Robin Chait” in the article is not Robin Chait:
@EoinHiggins_ 11/ Whoever the woman in that photo is, she is not, and never has been, my wife. Robin is the woman on the left, here:
@EoinHiggins_ 12/ Higgins further argues that I have a conflict of interest because I wrote a column criticizing union opposition to school reopening. Apparently my criticizing teacher unions for anything is a conflict of interest? nymag.com/intelligencer/…
@EoinHiggins_ 13/ Even if Robin was somehow lobbying for charter schools (she is not), what is the conflict of interest in my arguing for reopening schools?
@EoinHiggins_ 14/ Notably, his story does not look into real or imagined conflicts of interest of ANY other education policy commentator.
@EoinHiggins_ 15/ I know of magazines that take money from teachers unions and publish pro-union takes, without disclosing that. I happen to know of a columnist who wrote a pro-union column, and whose spouse has a teacher union as a client, and didn’t disclose that.
@EoinHiggins_ 16/ I don’t think Higgins cares about “conflicts of interest” in education policy. His agenda seems to be to further the teacher union narrative that their critics are nefarious tools of hidden interests.
@EoinHiggins_ 17/ Anyway, I have disclosed Robin’s work many times before. I’ll do it again here:
@EoinHiggins_ 18/ Prior to her current role, she has worked at the U.S. Department of Education, as a teacher at a D.C. traditional public school, Center for American Progress, the Office of the State Superintendent, and Center City Charter Public Charter schools.
@EoinHiggins_ 19/ I don’t claim my views are unrelated. As I’ve said, I’ve learned enormously from her deep expertise and experience in education:
@EoinHiggins_ 20/ Also, Higgins’ story does not mention that I publicly described him as a nincompoop. That relationship with the article’s subject feels like something a journalist supposedly covering an ethics story should… disclose?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Chait

Jonathan Chait Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jonathanchait

6 Nov
[thread] One progressive tic that I'd like to see go away is "X constituency won the election." We’ve seen this in a lot of elections, most memorably (for me) the Jones special election in Alabama.
If the point is to give a gold star to people who voted for your candidate, then the gold stars go to… everybody who voted for your candidate. You don’t deserve less credit for voting Democratic simply because fewer members of your demographic also voted Democratic.
One of the problems with this habit is that it reduces people to their race, or sometimes race+gender. Most voters are cross-pressured by multiple factors: education, religion, geography, etc. Seeing voters as undifferentiated ethnic blocs is terrible politics.
Read 5 tweets
24 Sep
A note on my coverage. My goal in writing about Trump has been to write about him like he was any other president. That standard is practically impossible to keep, because his offenses are at a scale and frequency so far beyond the historic norm.
The standard of "Would this story merit dropping everything and writing about immediately?" is one normal presidents meet every few weeks, or less. For Trump it's several times a day.
Yesterday @gregpmiller reported Trump making one of the most anti-Semitic comments any modern president has uttered. A normal pol would be facing calls to resign over this: nymag.com/intelligencer/…
Read 6 tweets
12 Sep
The freest of freebies would be for Biden or (better still!) Harris to denounce Robin DiAngelo. That would get media attention. nytimes.com/2020/09/12/us/… Image
I wrote about DiAngelo's theories this summer. They're really awful. nymag.com/intelligencer/…
Obviously few voters could identify DiAngelo. The point would be to drive coverage by the media.
Read 4 tweets
1 Sep
I've encountered some pretty dense people, but I'm not sure I've ever seen as brutally illiterate a misreading as @EoinHiggins_ does here: newrepublic.com/article/159158… Image
@EoinHiggins_ The entire point of my article is that the problem with the GOP is sysmetatically ideological and NOT an aberration! nymag.com/intelligencer/… Image
@EoinHiggins_ Writers do a bad job of understanding words all the time, but it's rare to see yourself represented as making the exact 100% opposite of your actual point.
Read 4 tweets
31 Jul
Karen Bass is highly-regarded by members of both parties, but her long history in the Venceremos Brigade would become a huge issue if she is nominated theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
I'm seeing her being described as a quiet, do-no-harm pick:
Here's Ed Rendell saying the same: cnn.com/2020/07/31/pol…
Read 4 tweets
7 Jul
Criticism of the letter seems to be split evenly between "they're rich/privileged/enjoy large platforms" and "they're has-beens embittered about being ignored."
People who want to dismiss the letter because their platforms are too small could argue with people who dismiss the letter because their platforms are too big, but I don't think they actually care what reason you glom onto
Letter writers can't be taken seriously because they're too irrelevant/

Letter writers can't be taken seriously because they're too influential Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!