3rd monitor, a Democrat: "Hundreds of these ballots seemed impeccable, with no folds or creases. The bubble selections were perfectly made ... only observed selections in black ink, and all
happened to be selections for Biden."
"Based on my observations, I believe there was fraud was committed in the presidential election and question the validity of the Georgia recount process."
Same witness went to a different Georgia county the next day and observed the same anomaly during the recount.
"All of these ballots had the same two characteristics: they were all for Biden and had the same perfect black bubble."
5th witness, K. FIsher, saw "very clean" military and overseas ballots with "no bubbles ... colored outside of the line" almost all for Biden, including batches that were 100% for Biden.
I deleted tweets with the names of two witnesses in this thread because they reached out "terrified". Redoing both below without the names.
The 5th witness alleging the same anomaly: hundreds of mail ballots without creases and perfectly marked bubbles that appear to not have been mailed. (Mail ballots are folded in order to be placed in an envelope.)
The 6th witness saw perfectly marked mail-in ballots, with some batches 100% for Biden, which appear to have been printed rather than filled out by someone at home.
Witness shared a spreadsheet of the box numbers in question.
The most important piece in today's 114-page ODNI document drop on the DNC hack/leak saga is on page 25, where a September 12, 2016, intelligence community assessment states:
Let's put September 12, 2016 in context.
This was after @CrowdStrike provided it's final report to the DNC. (August 24, 2016)
This was after the @FBI received a redacted copy of the Crowdstrike DNC "hack" report. (August 31, 2016)
Here's why that's important...
@CrowdStrike @FBI Less than a month later, on October 7, 2016, the U.S. government would go on to accuse Russia of hacking the DNC. This happened before the FBI received the server images of the hacked devices.
One of the most important statistics about modern science:
"More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments, and more than half have failed to reproduce their own experiments."
Email exchange between Christopher Scott and Robert Johnston (Crowdstrike), Adrian Hawkins and Jason Lowder (FBI), and Michael Sussmann (Perkins Coie).
On July 27, Johnston says Chris Scott is the CrowdStrike point of contact for the DNC/DCCC hack.
That July 27, 2016, email is a good who's-who of the FBI team working the DNC hack, including some names I never heard before: Adrian Hawkins, Joshua Hubiak, J.K. Mularski, Gerald Cotellessee, Christian Schorle.
"The analysis also revealed that there were more than 600 party members across 19 branches working at the British banks HSBC and Standard Chartered in 2016. Both have drawn criticism for their response to Beijing's crackdown in Hong Kong."
"Firms with defense industry interests including Airbus, Boeing and Rolls-Royce employed hundreds of [Chinese Communist] party members, the analysis showed."
Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost argues that the court SHOULD decide whether the Constitution permits state courts and state executive officials "to alter the rules by which presidential elections are conducted."
"The People need an answer, too. Until they get one, elections will continue to be plagued by doubts regarding whether the President was chosen in the constitutionally prescribed manner." -- AG Yost
The following 8 paragraphs of legal background in the Texas SCOTUS election case are a fascinating historical context worth sharing in a mini thread:
“The individual citizen has no federal
constitutional right to vote for electors for the
President of the United States unless and until the
state legislature chooses a statewide election as the
means to implement its power to appoint members of
the electoral college.”
State legislatures have plenary power to
set the process for appointing presidential electors:
“Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the
Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors.”
U.S. CONST. art. II, §1, cl. 2