“[S]ubstantial irregularities, improprieties, and fraud” in Nevada’s 2020 general election.
Democrat officials in Nevada sent massive amounts of unsolicited mail-in ballots resulting in an “overwhelming number of voters” receiving multiple ballots
Clark County officials “unilaterally decided” to use a Agilis ballot sorting machine to conduct signature verifications without scientific testing, and despite warnings “not to use signature verification machines.”
The signature verification machines used are less regulated than gambling machines in the state.
Clark Co. used Agilis machines to entirely replace signature verification
For over 130,000 ballots they used low quality images from DMV that are *incompatible* w/ the machine
Manufacturer advises against these low quality images if you want machine “to operate properly”
“Not surprisingly, the Agilis machine performed erratically...”
Nevada election law requires human verification of signatures on ballots “in every instance.”
Officials lowered the tolerance for signature checks, but still got a rejection rate of 70% on the Agilis machines.
The 30% were NEVER checked by a human, contrary to NV law.
And the 70%?
They were inspected by officials, who then acted to “push the votes through.”
Of the 70% of ballots rejected by the Agilis machine, officials counted 69%, ONLY 1% ultimately were rejected.
Ballots approved “so long as at least one letter” matched.
Evidence will show ballot rejection rate for signature mismatch is “well in excess of 1%.”
🚨🚨“The illegally counted votes far exceed the difference in the vote counts between Vice President Biden and President Trump.”🚨🚨
Officials pressured in Clark County to “count ballots that presented problems and irregularities.”
“No less than” 15,000 illegal votes from voters “known to have voted in other states.”
“No less than” 1,000 illegal votes from non-residents.
“No less than” 500 illegal votes from deceased individuals.
“No less than” 500 illegal mail-in ballots completed at polling places
USPS letter carriers directed to violate policy to deliver ballots to addresses of known deceased individuals.
Officials “refused to grant meaningful observation” of counting mail-in ballots, in violation of Nevada law.
Poll watchers “were constantly denied the ability to meaningfully observe operations,” “obstructed” and confined to spaces “too far away.”
Illegal voting drives offered gift cards, gas cards, t-shirts, raffle tickets in exchange for votes.
Organizers drove Biden-Harris vans and “openly encouraged people to vote for Joseph Biden.”
“[E]vidence will show that the nature and scale of that fraud and abuse renders the purported results of the Nevada election illegitimate.”
Evidence of 40,000 or more illegitimate ballots for Biden
.@GregStenstrom and @hoopes_leah’s Supreme Court case demands Special Master to oversee DOJ to force investigations into credible election fraud allegations in 2024
They claim you have no evidence after they refuse to investigate it and cover it up
Remember when Bill Barr acted like he was going to investigate fraud, and then leaked to AP that there “was none”?
They never actually investigated anything. Instead Barr hid behind a DOJ policy to defer any fraud investigations until AFTER certification (when it is moot)
Barr emailed the prosecutor who supposedly “quit” over his order to investigate “irregularities,” and told the prosecutor “we should avoid any investigative actions before the certifications are complete.”
It was all smoke and mirrors to cover up Election Fraud and ram through an illegitimate government
He wasn’t just ignoring allegations of election fraud, he was covering them up
Raffensperger’s lawyers argue he has no ongoing duty to ensure the voting system meets security standards “even in the face of overwhelming and uncontradicted proof of grave, egregious and well-known cybersecurity risks.”
1) encryption keys are stored in plain text in the election database
2) they still have a hard-coded vendor password that grants administrative privileges that has been publicly known since 2010 at the latest, “dvscorp08!”
3) multiple users use the same usernames and passwords
“These vulnerabilities leave the system wide open to hacking and alteration of election results without detection.”
Raffensperger has known about this since July 1, 2021
5 Congressman just filed a lawsuit in PA over Democrats refusal to verify identity in the overseas ballot program
There are 25,000 UOCAVA ballots in PA already for 2024 and only 3,600 —14% — are to military members and their family
85% of UOCAVA ballots were EMAILED and PA is doing NO citizenship verification
“This case is simple; the Pennsylvania Department of State is unlawfully diluting the rightful ballots of the brave men and women who serve our nation and their family members…In the Navy JAG Corps, I made daily trips into the red zone in Baghdad, this is personal to me. I will always stand up for those in uniform who deserve to have their right to a secure election protected.” - Congressman Guy Reschenthaler, Navy veteran
🚨🚨36 Georgia counties join DeKalb in amicus brief in support of lawsuit against Raffensperger🚨🚨
Ask court to grant transparency and oversight over 2024 Election and ensure Raffensperger follows the law re: insecure voting system
Raffensperger has “defaulted on his duty to ensure free and fair elections”
Dominion stores its encryption keys in an unprotected state — an “egregious, inexcusable violation” of basic cybersecurity best practices— leaving ANYONE with access to alter election results
Raffensperger has known about this major security vulnerability since at least March 2024, according to an email sent by his general counsel