The simultaneous advocacy for and complete misunderstanding of the way state standardized testing works never ceased to amaze me. Here's an explainer.
I am a seventh grade English teacher in Texas. That means my students have two state tests for my class - reading and writing. Allow me to explain just the writing test data, and how and why it is useless to me for any practical purpose.
The writing test has a multiple choice section and one essay. The last time my current students had a state writing test was the fourth grade, so the most recent data for them for that test is three years old. I can't and don't use three year old data to plan lessons.
The test is administered in the Spring and takes a long time to score - the essays for every single seventh grader in the state of Texas have to be scored by hand, so the results don't come until the end of the school year. I *literally* can't use that data.
The style and content of the test essay doesn't resemble writing students will use in any of their other classes. Time that we spend practicing test-style essay is time not spent learning to write research papers, or persuasive papers, stories, or information essays.
Because of the tremendous pressure on each district and campus to do well on the test, they give benchmarks. Administering them takes all day, and benchmark test days are a lost day of instruction, not just for my classes, but for all classes.
They don't happen til late in the fall, and I have to score them on top of my regular grading for actual essays for class. It's extremely time consuming.
Meanwhile: I teach writing. We practice many different kinds of writing. We edit, revise, share writing, collaborate with each other. That is time consuming, but it's also how they grow as writers. It's also VERY HARD TO DO when my instruction is interrupted with tests.
If you asked me right this second about each of my students, I could tell you their strengths and weaknesses as a writer and what they still need to work on. I would be using the *ample* amount of work we've done in class. I would not be using 3 yr old data.
That's just one test! There are many! Those data sets are meant for and useful to policy makers and school boards. Which is fine!!! But, it's a pandemic, my students are behind, and I need my instructional time to help kids catch up with writing skills.
I'm not saying I don't look at data! I do! I have many sources of data. I even look at STAAR data. But the classroom data I gather and have access to drives my instruction because it's immediate and actionable.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Things in schools right now are very, very, bad. Here's a thread of a few things I wish the general public would know: 1. There is no good Covid data. No entity is collecting data on students & staff getting sick in the US, so every article you've read is based on a shaky guess
2. Since there's no central guidance or plan or data gathering for schools, each of the states is doing their own thing. Gathering data, or not. Some record students and staff, some just students. 3. Within many states, each school district is doing it's own thing.
4. There is no common vocabulary for all of these different plans. So, if you read an article saying that there are low or high infection rates for "hybrid" school - that doesn't necessarily mean it's the same system as your kid's school, even if they say "hybrid".
The questions were always terrible - but this year it would actually have been helpful for teachers to have a survey where we could have shared what we've been doing and what our tech needs are. BECAUSE WE HAVE TECH NEEDS RIGHT NOW, IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO ASK.
Even in a normal year, the current questions are all *at* us - assumes tech is pedagogically good for everything, demands to know if we're doing it *enough*. More useful: ask us what is working, what's helpful, what's not working.
Instead, the district keeps spending money on programs that *do not work* the way that they're implementing them (hi, Edgenuity) and enforcing them hard.
Adding a gardening component to the Coding class may be the most genius idea I’ve ever had. Four days in front of a screen, Wednesday outside. Today was SO HOT, but kid, snacking on carrot he pulled up as we weeded and tilled, “this tastes so good, like I earned it”
PS, that vegetable garden is one of the most satisfying things in the world. Every school and every grade should grow food.
Research growing season/climate/region, choose plant vs. seeds, dig/till/weed/plant, then harvest and celebrate periodically. It’s so wholesome and satisfying and it makes everyone happy
FIRST: a language survey. Pro tip: I asked what languages kids *hear/understand/speak* ‘cause those are different things, my friends. Also, 3 generations: self, parents,grandparents
True story, and this will be a thread. I’m a teacher at a middle school in Texas. My school is broke, my district is broke, I’m broke. So, last month I go in person to the state capitol in Austin with my little empty bowl to ask for gruel.
Am in a state rep’s office, and the chief of staff grills me on how much teachers pay out of pocket for supplies, on average. I explain that an average is hard to pull out of a hat. Max to report to IRS is $250, and that’s the only place we report that kind of spending to
“Ballpark” she wants to know. Okay. I explain factors like teaching in a wealthy suburb with a monied PTA vs. small rural, elementary science teacher vs. HS band, etc. Then I tell her my own needs and costs. Not hard, I have over a decade of stories.