So...I'm reflecting today on when defunding police results in reduced budgets and reallocation. And I'm thinking abotu what I learned about minimizing policing as a public defender. A short thread.
Obviously, the best world is when we replace policing with better, more restorative and beneficial resources and services for community members. But the first logical step in this journey is always cutting back on what we have police do. This actually already happens all the time
When I practiced in the Bronx, every once in a while the police would throw a fit and refuse to do anything more than "necessary" arrests. And we were all like...great? Should we *always* only be arresting people when necessary?
But of course the police spend *most of their time* making unnecessary arrests. Arrests that do little for public safety (like arresting the doodz who sell water outside Yankee stadium in summer, or kids "trespassing" by hanging out with friends at they friend's aunt's building).
These arrests, of course, do massive harm to the arrest person's life. Every arrest, every booking, every trip through jail is violent and traumatizing and disruptive. You miss work. You miss school. You can't pick up your kid or make your shrink appointment. Lasting consequences
So when police would, like, do their ridiculous strike by scaling back these unnecessary arrests--and not manufacturing drug crime with undercover buy and busts, too--we'd see an arraignment court that had WAY FEWER PEOPLE COMING THROUGH. It was excellent.
Excellent because the only people who were there were people actually accused of doing harm. Yes, we can still do better in how we respond to harm. But my point is, police can easily, easily cut their arrests back by a massive % and have no negative impact on public safety.
They're reducing costs in the system, leaving more $for better things (like education and jobs programs!). They're not traumatizing thousands of citizens and disrupting their lives for no reason. Trickle-down effect is increased economic mobility and freedom for the community.
All of which is to say, if you think this is theoretical, or speculative...it's not. Ask any public defender who has been in arraignments while the police department has scaled back operations. It's a temporary visit to a better--actually safer and stronger--world.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Emily Galvin-Almanza

Emily Galvin-Almanza Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GalvinAlmanza

11 Nov
Like, if you find yourself confused, ask yourself:

Does it have a face?
Can it cry?
Can I hug it?
Does it have a favorite food?
Does it ever go to the doctor?

These are all helpful ways to tell if something might be a person, should you find yourself in the struggle.
I was careful to make my standard inclusive. Notice that dolphins are probably people.

But Waffle Heaven is not.
Read 4 tweets
4 Nov
I'm just sitting here thinking about how utterly disgusting it is the @LADAOffice let @IamMRMOSELY out of jail as soon as the voters repudiated Lacey

Just confirms prosecutorial decision making based on what they can get away with rather than what is right
OH MY GOD PEOPLE READ THE TWEET

I am CELEBRATING Drakeo getting out and CALLING OUT HOW CORRUPT THE PROSECUTORS ARE
Context: my prior writing on why everything about gang prosecution and the Drakeo case is racist af

theappeal.org/drakeo-califor…
Read 4 tweets
22 Oct
Just heard deputy Attorney General Rosen on @WYPublicRadio NORTH talking about the Purdue settlement. He said that the law doesn't allow you to strip someone of all of their assets because of wrongdoing, but you have to analyze the crime and have a proportionate response... 1/2
... would he please advise thousands of DAs across the nation who routinely strip people not only of their assets but of their right to vote or their right to parenthood on the basis of conduct far less serious than creating an opioid epidemic?
As always, my point is that we need to treat ordinary people better, not that we need to treat everybody worse. In case that wasn't obvious.
Read 4 tweets
2 Oct
Hey, if you are wildly swept up in a new cycle that moves way too fast, like me, you may have missed the fact that D Cameron admitted the only charge he submitted to the Breonna Taylor grand jury was wanton endangerment.

washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/09…
This means the Attorney General knew that any grand jury was basically gonna indict those cops of whatever he put in front of them. So he didn't give them the option to hold anyone accountable for Taylor's death.
He lied to the people of his state.

He lied to you.

He walked into a space where he was supposed to be a prosecutor and did not carry out his duty, as that duty would be carried out against any ordinary person.
Read 12 tweets
28 Sep
I know we're all tied up with national stuff right now, but is anyone paying attention to what's happening with that juvenile jail NSI in Wyoming, where kids are fleeing and terrified and the state decided that "the market would decide" if their "therapeutic" techniques are good?
This is a facility that was nearly shut down in Michigan for causing the death of a young man. A chain of kid jails that is currently being investigated. And the state of Wyoming thinks the market will decide if this is a problem?
I'm sorry... kids are not widgets. They're not for sale and their treatment and care should not be decided by whether or not people *purchase the services* of a child prison.
Read 17 tweets
3 Jul
So...much to my surprise (and I should definitely make the deliberate choice to stop being surprised these days) I have learned that there are folks out there who think that people who *film* Karens in the wild are somehow responsible for provoking said Karens.

A thread.
I sat with this for a while, and realized that if one had not had much exposure to the way Black men are utterly brutalized by our system, and if one imagines a stranger randomly filming them *doing nothing wrong, minding one's own business* how filming could seem provocative.
So...I feel like I have to explain this if you're out there (or if your friends or relatives or family) take this view.

Christian Cooper--and everyone else who has captured these videos--is doing the single best thing they can do to protect themselves from harm.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!