NYC teachers union passes "Black Lives Matter at School" resolution calling for, among many other things, "disrupting the Western-prescribed nuclear family."
Calling it an act of liberation from Western oppression is what's (relatively) new.
Stating that collective care should happen "to the extent that mothers, parents and children are comfortable" is a curious touch.
The recently introduced framework for the "Culturally Sustaining-Responsive Education" that the resolution affirms seeks a transformation of the way students are taught with a heavy emphasis on "power and privilege," and "decentering dominant ideologies" nysed.gov/common/nysed/f…
It's really not just "It Takes a Village" or other things that sound familiar to you, but I get why one want to make it so.
The CSRE framework is so abstract and jargon-ridden that it's hard to say what it actually means in practice. A strong suspicion of traditional modes of evaluation (grades, tests) and deference toward "other ways of knowing" pervades the whole document.
In practice, you can see writing hip-hop lyrics as a way to get an A in English, for instance. (If grades are given at all.) But there will also be explicit lessons in power and privilege and oppression.
It's hard not seeing these very abstract directives being turned in practice by workaday public school teachers into extremely rigid and dogmatic exercises in repeating political slogans
Such as this page of "white culture" that appeared on the website of the National African American History Museum until being replaced this summer after attracting online controversy:
btw that page of "white culture" was subsequently replaced by a page on "whiteness" linked here: nmaahc.si.edu/learn/talking-…
Orlando Patterson on the myth of the hood and the reality of black social isolation
Patterson is not the be all and end all on the subject, but he is a careful empirical practitioner who backs up all his conclusions with extensive and rigorous survey data
The "Cosby as symbol of American fatherhood" and where it eventually went has really not been fully processed
One thing it does is seem to confirm what MacKinnonite feminists regard as the true face of patriarchy
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
88 percent of college students have pretended to hold woke views to succeed socially or academically.
The article looks at the psychic injuries inflicted on a generation of students by this mandated fakery.
Don't forget about the ethical dimension. The mindless loyalty tests pervasive on college campuses have crippled the moral and intellectual integrity of a generation of future leaders.
The woman who killed his wife and two children is a man. He is a man who began claiming to be a woman after his arrest for killing his wife and two young children. The Canadian media called him a woman in accordance with their style guidelines that dictate that a "woman is anyone says they are a woman."
They can't say it's BS for the male murderers and rapists because the basis of their claim to be women is the exact same basis for the claim to be a women as every other "trans women": all are men who say they are women
You have 30 other men that you can summon to gang rape a 12-year old on speed dial and trust none to rat you out or try to dissuade you rather than jump to take part because they are all your cousins, brothers, uncles, and nephews
There is no daylight between 1.) what a genocidal fascist would invent about what this immigrant community of Brown foreigners invited in the millions to the UK is capable of doing and 2.) a neutral description of what this immigrant community invited in the millions to the UK actually did.
What now?
The answer of the British state is to place its own citizenry that had this community inflicted on them without their consent or input under surveillance and jail them for wrongthink.
Vance is the figure that many people said would necessarily emerge from the browning of America and the concomitant end of the white majority -- the first national political figure to go through the gauntlet of elite socialization, marry a fellow legal elite of Indian ancestry, emerge into the world of the Great Awokening at its height and seek to find a way to take the side of Anglo-America in a palatable but unapologetic way, shrugging off all the epithets that would be applied to such an attempt. Can this be done? Is there in fact an Anglo-American subject that can speak?
"Those of us with ancestors buried in Civil War gravesites" names a faction of country (many of whom, of course, were non-Anglo immigrants sent here by the Irish potato famines and the revolutions of 1848) who underwent an American ethnogenesis and brought the new nation to the summit of global power. What are this faction's interests? Does it have any? Or must its fate simply be to defer and acquiesce to economic and demographic processes and imperatives that it itself unleashed that are now beyond its control? Is any assertion of such interests inherently illegitimate, charged with peril, a slippery slope to death camps? Or does this core have a historical role to play in the continued shaping of the country its ancestors founded?
Vance's career will be an answer to these questions.
The point here is that left-wing adversaries who hear a dogwhistle in his references to ancestors buried in American soil are right and wrong. He's not dogwhistling, he's making an essentially overt case that the founders of this country have a distinctive claim on this country that they have been and are willing to share with others but under terms and conditions that they will at minimum have a key role in defining. x.com/LongRiverRuns/…
That is to say, he is seeking to bring about a world in which one no longer must dogwhistle about such matters, because the prior settlement ("Boomerism") that a policy of blanket deference on these matters was the only conceivable no longer works under conditions of simultaneous mass immigration and Great Awokening.
It's really not complicated. The New Left/Fanonist vision of the world is that Nazi Germany was a pale and failed much belated shadow of what Anglo colonists succeeded in doing in the New World, building an empire founded on genocide and slavery buttressed by a disgustingly hypocritical gloss of verbiage about liberty and justice enacted by racist white supremacist murderers and enslavers. It's not some abstruse and complicated intellectual construct, it's the articulation of the perspective of those on the receiving end of imperial expansion.
It's the foundational worldview of that political faction and while it was utterly defeated politically in the 1970'd and 1980's, it succeeded totally in leveraging the foothold it had in academia to capture K-12 education and the rest of the machinery of socialization. And now its on the cusp of direct political power in the global capitol of capital.
Why is Zohran Mamdani giving the finger to the man who discovered the New World? He sees himself as living in the Thousand Year Reich looking at a statue of Heinrich Himmler.
I should clarify that the perspective of those on the receiving end of imperial expansion refers to those who retain anti-imperial pride and resistance -- invariably a faction of native elites and those they inculcate into sharing that pride. The mass of the peasantry and the coopted elite class sees little distinction between old and the new masters, and may well prefer the new masters, especially if they build dams, hospitals, roads railways, and schools, and seek the eradication of backward and depraved customs while proselytizing on behalf of an egalitarian and forgiving God who offers a pathway of salvation to any and all.
The media is pivoting from “it’s not happening” with regard to dosing 11 year old girls with testosterone and cutting off their healthy breasts at 12 so they can be “nonbinary” to doing sympathetic, soft focus profiles of the mother who approved of it in only her words — normalizing a destructive mania and vilifying those who resist it
They use of the “as told to” format is a striking choice