This election isn’t + never been in “dispute”- one side *lies* to negate a free, fair election.
Why does this platform refer to a LIE as a “dispute”?
There are many facts. Statements in the total absence of any reality are not “disputes”, they’re lies.
The world’s largest microphone does not, or will ever make, an bald, outright lie anymore true.
It should read “an bald”. That’s the actual, correct grammatical rule!
🕛 This statement has been disputed
What if I had a whole political party and a “network” that was willing to argue that “John has a great head of hair!”
What if actual, legitimate outlets covered a press conference where someone argued he has “proof” John has great hair and that Venezuela is holding it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Giving a platform + amplifying lies-with literally zero evidence-attached entirely to an agenda of chaos subverts + fundamentally damages core American democracy.
“Both sides of an argument” is an antiquated paradigm of current journalism until one “side” stops actively lying in an unabashed push to overthrow the returns a free, fair and open democratic election.
A Westmoreland County Republican volunteer “called an attorney representing the Trump campaign Monday to recommend a challenge of a ballot rejected by his provisional board.”