Judge Brann: IT MEANS YOU LOSE. GOOD DAY SIR. pacer-documents.s3.amazonaws.com/147/127057/155… 
To translate from Willy Wonka, the federal judge in the PA case dismissed the pending complaint with prejudice and denied Giuliani’s attempt to amend it. The case is over (pending appeal).
Read it read it read it
“That Plaintiffs are trying to mix-and-match claims to bypass contrary precedent is not lost on the Court.”
“Prohibiting certification of the election results would not reinstate the Individual Plaintiffs’ right to vote. It would simply deny more than 6.8 million people *their* right to vote.”
The avuncular-judge-recommending-a-bar indicator crashes and burns, not for the first time.
https://twitter.com/jennaellisesq/status/1328849514015363072?s=21
https://twitter.com/jennaellisesq/status/1328849514015363072
And the hits. just. keep. on. coming.
The Trump campaign failed to cite a federal court decision from Nevada that directly rejected its theory of standing in a case it was a party to two months ago.
A great, concise discussion of equal protection remedies and why Trump’s proposed remedy was so perverse.
Vindication for the firm of Swaine & Viebeck.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
