I want to offer a theory for why 73 million Americans voted for Trump despite his evident deficiencies as a president and, truly, as a human being. To my mind, it’s a pretty basic manifestation of nationalist myth making, albeit accelerated by modern social media. 🧵
All nationalisms are rooted in myth; artificially constructed narratives about the roots of “our” unity, and apartness from “the others”. That’s why we have flags and anthems: they are memetic forms of identity construction.
Now, most nationalist myths are still partially rooted in material reality or lived practice: territory, language, cultural norms, religion etc. But the trick is in weaving a coherent narrative that includes some and not other peoples and practices in a given region.
Trump’s great innovation is that he has advanced an almost entirely rhetorical project. Yes, his political project is deeply steeped in the legacies of white supremacy and xenophobia in America. But the accompanying cult of personality, incl the Q mysticism is a potent variation.
Trump offered not policy, substance, or results; he offered narrative. A narrative in which he and his followers were locked in a divine struggle against demonic forces. Insane? Of course. But if you create a parallel media environment in which this new identity can be forged...
...you can get a lot people to buy into it, especially in a country as deeply religious & conservative as the U.S. That’s just propaganda 101; it’s the Stab in the Back Legend w/ hashtags. It’s Milosevic’s “Heavenly Serbia”. The substance is familiar, the medium has been updated.
And the reason why it’s so effective is bc a lot of folks would rather be paladins in the forces of heaven — even if it means participating in atrocities against their neighbors — than middling, suburban “nobodies”. And, again, when there’s an entire alternative media...
...environment created to egg them on, to feed their delusions, to whip up the mob frenzy then, yeah, you’ll get 73 million votes for a semi-literate vulgarian w/ a messiah complex. Because it’s all narrative, it’s all myth; nothing is real except his word and his promise.
And to assert otherwise is actually to “prove” his point. Trump convinced his followers that suggesting he had erred was a sin, itself evidence of corruption and idiocy. The more the MSM media and civil society tried to engage in a reality and fact based discourse, the more...
...his base became convinced of his myth and prophecy. And it’s why you’re seeing these deranged post-elxn antics. Forced to choose btw myth - “Trump won in a landslide” - & reality - he lost in a landslide - they choose the frmr, despite all facts to the contrary, bc they...
...prefer the other narrative & Trump keeps feeding them just that. Narrative, rhetoric, and myth. That’s the narcotic; the myth is the point. And that’s why it will survive virtually any material defeat (cf. the continuing potency of nationalism in Serbia post-Milosevic).
The only way out is systemic, mass de-programming (e.g. denazification) and/or generational evolution. And even the former is highly dependent on the latter; cf. Germany’s ‘68 generation. But, unfortunately, that’s a ways off yet — and a relapse is possible, maybe even likely. /x

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jasmin Mujanović

Jasmin Mujanović Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JasminMuj

31 Oct
The way that part of the American media are generically talking about the prospects for “post-elxn violence” evacuates all agency & responsibility from the architects of this climate of fear. It reminds me of the “ancient ethnic hatreds” myth from the Bosnian War.
No other elxn in U.S. history has had the cloud of large-scale civil strife hanging over it. And that’s bc no President or candidate has weaponized racial, sectarian grievance in the way Trump has. Nor has anyone associated himself w/ extremist paramilitaries like Trump has...
...or turned government into a vehicle for naked partisan pursuits. Trump has made Americans fear in the integrity of their democratic process & he has invited & encouraged them to use violence as a response. He has done this on purpose & he is responsible for this chaos.
Read 5 tweets
23 Sep
You know, most strongmen at least pretend that they will abide by the results of their (usually fraudulent) democratic elections. Even they know better than to openly say: yes, I’m thinking about clinging to power through the use of force - next question?!
Also how does a comment like that not immediately shut down whatever exchange was previously taking place? How is it not immediate breaking news on every channel? “President hints at use of violence to hang on to power” is kind of an existentially massive deal.
And taking the line that “he’s just trolling” isn’t rational, given the stakes. Maybe the pilot was kidding when he said he intends to fly us into that mountain. Or, maybe, he’s going to fly us into the mtn. The disparity in consequences means you take the mtn scenario seriously.
Read 5 tweets
19 Sep
As politics has become more volatile in both the EU & US I’ve observed an interesting cultural difference btw Americans & W. Europeans. On the whole, Americans are much more receptive to outside critique/analysis of their own politics. West Europeans remain remarkably insular...
...even xenophobic in how they respond to “foreigners” commenting on their politics. Americans & U.S. media (& the Brits, to some extent) are far more willing to platform outsiders than most in W. Europe. At the extreme, this also manifests in how W. Europeans talk about...
...foreign policy. In my exp, policy discussions on the Balkans, my area of expertise, are considerably more diverse in the U.S. than in the EU. In the U.S. local experts/analysts are given far greater space. In the EU, I’ve been to Balkans conferences where 3/4ths are of...
Read 4 tweets
19 Sep
True watershed moments in democratic polities are those for which there can be no redress; only fallout. These are usually instances when elites act so wantonly that they incinerate trust in the democratic process itself, calling into question the legitimacy of the whole regime.
Tho it was not a democratic regime, the end of the Yugoslav federation was sealed on Jan. 22 1990 when the Slovene delegation walked out of the 14th Congress of the League Communists. But the fighting in YUG didn’t start until June 1991. The die is cast ahead of the eruption.
In periods of genuine, existential political crisis you can count the number of off ramps on one hand. And they decrease sharply w/ time & increased polarization. Anyone not already completely consumed by sectarian vitriol can see what they are — and when they’ve been passed.
Read 4 tweets
16 Sep
Grateful to @JoinPersuasion & @Yascha_Mounk for publishing my short essay on the history & culture of historical revisionism among Western “anti-imperialists”. A timely intervention, I hope, on debates & discourses about true “international solidarity”. persuasion.community/p/a-sorry-excu…
“There is no shortage of prominent left-wing academics, journalists, artists and activists who have sought to twist the historical record concerning atrocities and the regimes that perpetrated them.” persuasion.community/p/a-sorry-excu…
“The far left vision of foreign affairs is fogged by conspiratorial accounts...all events embody a simple split: on one side, the American empire and its corrupt proxies; on the other side, noble adversaries, who by opposing the U.S. are progressive.” persuasion.community/p/a-sorry-excu…
Read 5 tweets
14 Sep
The mechanisms of oppression under illiberal & authoritarian regimes are not absolute. What makes them so pernicious is that terror is unevenly distributed across different segments of the population. While some groups are actively persecuted, others are at the mall.
This is important also for how we think about the *threat* of illiberalism/authoritarianism. Those w/ the least to fear from such regimes - the well-connected & the well-to-do - typically opt for silence, co-operation, or obfuscation bc it’s just easier. Opposition is dangerous.
In practical terms, it means that even thru dramatic political crises, an evident campaign against the rule of law, or amid an active state terror regime, a segment of the salon intelligentsia will find ways to characterize principled opposition as “alarmism”.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!