Thread by @bradheath

Meanwhile, John Solomon has been looking through court cases and claims to have found "a mountain of evidence has been amassed in private lawsuits alleging there was, in fact, significant and widespread voting misconduct."

There isn't. This is profoundly misleading.

Here's the link if you're curious, justthenews.com/politics-polic…, though I caution you that reading it will leave you *less* informed.

Solomon claims to have found "a dozen compelling allegations of voting irregularities."

But no.

Item 1 is a Detroit poll worker who claimed thousands of ballots had been backdated or falsified. She did claim that, but Solomon leaves out quite a lot.

What he leaves out: A judge has already reviewed her claims and found them not to be credible. And the judge made it quite clear that the "irregularities" she observed aren't irregularities at all and she just has no idea what she's talking about.

Here's the judge's opinion. You should read this one, because it pretty conclusively stomps a lot of the claims of "irregularities" from poll-watchers in Detroit who basically didn't know how the system they were observing was supposed to operate. assets.documentcloud.org/documents/7328…

Item 2: Mismatched precinct totals in Detroit.

Again, if he'd checked a bit, Solomon would have found that this is pretty routine in Detroit, the impact was maybe a couple hundred votes, and the city did better this year than in previous elections.

Item 3: Poll watchers saw "pristine" ballots during the recount.

But guess what? Georgia uses touch-screen voting machines that produce machine-printed ballots. The report doesn't mention this.

It goes on like this. It doesn't get any better. It's a good example of people who know better spreading innuendo and half-truths to prey on those who don't.