Lindsey Graham is illustrative of the GOP as an institution. Like the GOP, people think Graham is a weakling, a kind of dainty loser blowing in the wind. But Graham is extremely conniving. He is aware of the cartoonish image of himself and uses it to his advantage 1/
So you think you're going to play Graham, you're going to whip Graham/the GOP into shape, but it doesn't work out that way and you ultimately end up getting conned and neutralized 2/
This is the obstacle people who want to reform the GOP will encounter over and over. Trump may have superficially changed the GOP, but its funding structure is the same, it did to him more or less what it did to Reagan. The GOP is like a death trap for populism 3/
Not sure how to bypass this. With Trump, we tried the top-down approach: run someone from within the GOP and have them try to reform it from the top. But Trump was too unfocused, undisciplined, given to petty disputes, and open to compromise with the GOP 4/
Maybe if Trump was abler at mobilizing the anger of his base to cow the GOP into submission and back a series of true AF candidates... but it's unclear if that would work, because this is the GOP after all and generally speaking you don't capture the GOP but vise versa 5/
The bottom-up approach that does not involve simply running America First Republicans and attempting to stage an insurgency is creating an alternative party and connecting with a large enough base of people. This would take more time and a lot of money 6/
A good litmus test for anyone involved in this would be to embrace issues that the GOP finds totally toxic, like healthcare reform and raising corporate taxes, two things the GOP won't touch because they've memed themselves a corner where these things are sOcIalisM 7/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ah, so this justifies a foreign policy of bombing and invading as many countries as possible and selling weapons to the Saudis so they can exterminate Yemenis. Because the Holocaust and stuff
2. It's Mother Jones but this is also a GOP talking point, which includes many pro-Trump pundits. A byproduct of "Trumpism" corrupted Jared Kushner and Brooke Rollins is that Trumpism 2020 embraced a version of Democratic Party identity politics
Sure, all politics are tied to identity, but what I mean is that the GOP has connected itself to a specific, toxic variation of identity politics, i.e., "get off the plantation," which makes a kind of religious antiracism a staple of the GOP
People ask why, as a Latino, do I hammer white guilt among liberals and conservatives. Hayes' tweet is illustrative: the modern white psyche conditioned to worship nonwhites in a religious psychosexual ethnomasochism 1/
Our politics, Republican and Democrat, are dominated by the accompanying neurosis and narcissism of whites suffering from what is basically a mental and spiritual illness. Conservatives aren't immune. They think they are, but they are just as bad 2/
It's the reason why conservatives rationalize and justify bringing rappers to the White House, releasing dangerous felons, the Platinum Plan, the American Dream Plan, it's behind the "immigrants do the jobs Americans don't want to do" slogans, it's why conservatives pander 3/
Prediction: The GOP is going to use exaggerated and misleading claims about current border security to justify cutting an amnesty deal. "We beat illegal immigration and Latinos voted for Donal Tron, therefore, it's time for bipartisan amnesty."
Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 2.0
Part of the problem is the remarkably uncritical Trump base. I'm sorry guys, but we aren't helping the cause by refusing to drop the insane "antiracism" stuff and hammer pandering instead. This is playing into where the GOP wants to go
The issue with Powell was never that fraud didn't occur. Fraud is real. The issue was that Powell's claims are so extraordinary that they would threaten to discredit the case for real fraud if they turned out to be untrue and this ended up a grift 1/
Fraud happened. There is evidence of fraud happening across the country that should be the focus. But by making Powell the center of it all, the case for fraud began to hang on her claims primarily. Then "belief" in Powell became a kind of purity test for everyone 2/
So this is not to say there is some truth to Powell's basic claims, or that fraud did not happen, but that the alarm was always about the case for fraud being entirely associated with one woman's hitherto unproven claims 3/