Thread by @VTHOUndervalued

@steffawn_ @MoonShotCaller @Crypt0_kenny @UVtho I will eventually hold VET, but we're a long ways from that

The goal is to keep Tx cost low, not VTHO, VET is meant to appreciate due to VTHO becoming more valuable

Tx cost is kept low by adjusting the amount of VTHO per Tx

@steffawn_ @MoonShotCaller @Crypt0_kenny @UVtho If Tx is 30 VTH0, and VTHO does 100x, Tx cost is .3 VTHO, which is the same cost

This is how it has been happening and how it's outlined in the White Paper

Small adjustments allows us to keep pushing the 37 mil burn mark without a massive dump or volatility of a Gen Rate change

@steffawn_ @MoonShotCaller @Crypt0_kenny @UVtho In the White Paper, Gen Rate change is a last resort if over an extended period of time changing Tx cost doesn't stabilize the network

Gen Rate change requires a hard fork of the blockchain and a community wide vote

Holders will likely not vote to instantly devalue their VTHO

@steffawn_ @MoonShotCaller @Crypt0_kenny @UVtho Preferably, Gen Rate change will never happen, but if it does, the only plausible scenario would be to lower the generation rate in case of VET and VTHO doing a 100x because of a BTC run

VTHO is meant to rise in value, that's what will make VET valuable, it's in the tokenomics