I propose the concept of “platformentality,” which concerns how tech platforms direct users’ conduct through positive means & the willing (if not knowing) participation of those in the network. (This is in contrast to Zuboff’s crypto-Marxist concept of “surveillance capitalism.”)
The key point is that *a network is not a society.* Therefore the models of analysis and intervention that made sense when discussing the society of a nation-state are simply not fit for purpose when dealing with networks.
One answer to this that some people have had is to force networks back into national containers, so that the old political and regulatory frameworks can be applied. This will work only to the extent that the global connectivity promise of Internet is abandoned.
It is asp what makes proposals for “grand tech bargains” or “an alliance of techno-democracies” DOA, little more than emblems of nostalgia for a lost world & an obsolete model of governance
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“Structural adjustment” is usually understood narrowly to mean the conditional lending programs, imposed on poor countries (usually amid debt crises) in order to get them to agree to the reforms which by 1990 became known as "the Washington Consensus."
But a fuller understanding of the global history of "structural adjustment" would have to go well beyond this, to include three additional crucial stories.
"Political violence in democracies often seems spontaneous. But in fact, the crisis has usually been building for years, and the risk factors are well known. The United States is now walking the last steps on that path." - @RachelKleinfeldwashingtonpost.com/outlook/americ…
Americans struggle to envision how the US may be faced with a new civil war, because we think a civil war entails massed armies fighting set piece battles over territory. But we’re not in the 19th century any more, & that’s not how wars (including civil wars) get fought nowadays.
Nowadays wars (including civil wars) get fought with information operations, “little green men,” targeted assassinations, and cyberattacks designed mainly to demoralize & disorient the adversary.
Seen from that perspective, Civil War 2.0 has ALREADY begun in the United States.
The future is already here, it’s just unevenly distributed
Covid-19 is in fact the THIRD major ‘grey rhino’ event that has happened this century – the first being 9/11, the second being the global financial crisis, and the third being the novel coronavirus pandemic.
These all have in common that they (a) were foreseeable, (b) were foreseen, (c) were inadequately prepared for and (consequently) responded to, and (d) exposed and deepened political and social fissures, both nationally and globally.
Plenty of other Grey Rhinos lurk in the wing: US/China hot war; the disorderly implosion of the EU; the collapse of the global dollar system; a cyber pearl harbor; Indo-Pakistani nuclear war; radically bioengineered humans; discontinuous climate change; etc.
A lot to digest in this @samuelmoyn piece on the political dangers of the misuse of historical analogy, especially an overly promiscuous use of "the political F-word" (fascism) to contextualize 😡. A couple of quick responses. nybooks.com/daily/2020/05/…
1: Methodologically, I 100% agree that historical comparisons, especially when made for policy analysis, must always identify BOTH the similarities between the cases AND the differences. Neustadt & May made this point definitively in THINKING IN TIME amazon.com/Thinking-Time-…
2: I also agree (though with some reservations) that when comparing monstrous historical episodes, the point of comparisons should not be the diminish or relativize the monstrosities in question. "Not as bad as the Nazis" is lousy history and lousy politics.