Philip Bump Profile picture
25 Nov, 4 tweets, 1 min read
🤨🤔💩
love 2 take random twitter speculation and apply a veneer of cable news legitimacy
This is correct. bit.ly/3m7jp0G

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Philip Bump

Philip Bump Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @pbump

24 Nov
Over/under on the number of times Trump says "Dow" during this is 6.5.
Related: how Trump wants credit for the market whenever it's up and wants to avoid blame if it's down. washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/…
Trump says 30,000 is a "sacred number."

Spoke for like a minute with Pence next to him and then left.
Read 5 tweets
21 Nov
One time my wife and I were lucky enough to go to Africa and while driving somewhere at one point we encountered an elephant.

“Do you see it?” I asked her, in what has become canonically the stupidest question I’ve ever asked.
Literally we were in a little truck and the elephant was maybe ten feet behind it.
Read 4 tweets
20 Nov
Ah, McEnany — a government employee — is still hyping this Post-it note which *two weeks ago* a judge dismissed as hearsay.
And lo, he hath brought receipts. michigan.gov/documents/ag/2…
It's not just that it's nonsense, it's *proven* nonsense. Meaning essentially all of it.
Read 4 tweets
19 Nov
Guys, believe it or not, it just got more insane.
The vote for President Trump was 'so overwhelming' that it 'broke the algortihm' that had been programmed, we are told by ... Michael Flynn's attorney. This was a function of 'communist money.'

Totally bonkers and nonsensical.

As I was typing this, Soros was looped in.
If your goal is to present a believable case for how the election results are suspect, you should not have Sidney Powell offering up theories that would make Alex Jones be like "maybe dial it back".
Read 6 tweets
19 Nov
Show me actual evidence that there was enough fraud to swing the results in even one state — or even *close* to swinging the results — and I'll take this seriously.

That's all I ask.
Just to clarify:
• Not having as many observers as you want as votes are counted is not fraud.
• Unsubstantiated and unquantified accusations are not proof of fraud. Neither are debunked ones.
Oh, yes, I meant to add that sworn affidavits that don't actually show any fraud are also not germane to my point.
Read 6 tweets
18 Nov
For the next two minutes, if you reply to this with the name of a state I will tell you if it has too many, too few or just the right number of counties.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!