GrapheneOS isn't going to be including Google services in the base OS: grapheneos.org/#never-google-….

This doesn't mean it won't be possible to use apps depending on Play services on GrapheneOS. It means it shouldn't be deeply integrated into the OS as a cross-user, privileged app.
We're going to support installing a Google compatibility layer within a user profile as a regular app. The OS will include minimal support for this in a way that does not compromise the security model. It won't have special privileges other than masquerading as Play services.
We plan to add support for using a GrapheneOS release of microG this way. In the longer term, we also plan to offer a more minimal compatibility layer implemented by pretending that Google services are offline. Both will be options you can choose to install in a specific profile.
Our releases of the apps signed with specific keys will be able to pretend to be a specific app (Play services). microG is capable of functioning this way rather than as a cross-user, privileged system app since this is not how we'll be providing neutral AOSP APIs like geocoding.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with GrapheneOS

GrapheneOS Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GrapheneOS

3 Apr 19
@_copperj @grufwub @CopperheadOS No, this is the direct continuation of the original project by the original development team. The project was started before Copperhead was founded and long before it was incorporated. People can confirm this for themselves by looking at the code, dates and published documents.
@_copperj @grufwub @CopperheadOS You agreed to support this open source project by building a business around it while explicitly agreeing that it would remain as an independent entity from the business without Copperhead directly owning or controlling it. You went back on your word and betrayed the project.
@_copperj @grufwub @CopperheadOS You hijacked the infrastructure and prevented the previous incarnation of the project from ever being able to release a legitimate update again. You stole the donations sent to support the development team and siphoned off the revenue earned based on leeching off the project.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!