Systemic racism today creates structural/institutional racism tomorrow.

Structural racism - ongoing overall social disadvantage of a racialized group as a result of previous policies or social norms based on widely held beliefs of their inferiority in socially valued contexts.
While systemic racism is about currently existing beliefs of inferiority, structural racism reflects structures that are now "baked in". Let's say you create a race and deny that race the opportunity to earn wealth for 300 years. Structures that now depend on wealth enforce that
A lot of instances of structural racism are defensible if you ignore racial impacts. Schools being funded by income is defensible. Black neighborhoods being poorer, and that school funding system being rooted in that fact, makes it structural.
I believe this view of institutional/structural racism is in line with how Kwame Ture defined the term in 1967.

Past systemic racism outlasts the beliefs and policies and become baked in.
Structural racism can also feed systemic racism.

The belief that black Americans *naturally* can't swim very well, are examples of structural racism feeding systemic racism

Very few remember the racial history of public pools and their lack of availability in black communities.
How to fix structural racism?

I have bad news. Because it's structural, it won't fix itself. It takes explicit steps. This was LBJ's justification for Affirmative Action.

You can aim to take those steps in a supposedly colorblind way, but the impact must be clearly racial.
Fixing structural racism has trade-offs. This is something I do wish more people would admit. If black folks are 5% of a group and we think they should be 10%, then it does mean someone who otherwise would've fit in that 5% now won't. They won't like it. We can admit that.
Do I think these trade-offs are fair? Absolutely. I have no problem admitting that. If you can give me a colorblind way to reach the goal cool, but the real benchmark is the goal.

I was asked if I thought it was fair a college had openings only for indigenous profs. Yes.
This thread is long. I had meant to write it as an article but couldn't find time to settle down. If you stuck around. Thanks for reading.

It's important that we're willing to define and defend our terms. We don't have to agree, but we should be able to say what we disagree with

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Mansa Keita

Dr. Mansa Keita Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rasmansa

27 Oct
Yes, I definitely discount the views of people using those terms "seriously". They've chosen to signal something and that's how I respond to that signal.

We should though be able to get past that and focus on the value/morality of specifics if they are provided.
I think this because I want the same treatment when talking about racism.

A person knows something about me when and how I refer to racism, and it's fair for them to factor that in.

We can get stuck on my use of the word, or we can talk about the issue I'm pointing to.
I'll say we often find ways to focus on minor things like our disagreement on social terms to avoid answering the social specifics. This goes both ways too, because I think "cancel culture" or "fascist" as terms are intentionally broad to avoid specifics.
Read 4 tweets
20 Oct
A lot of people think it takes special innate abilities to be a coder. That's very wrong. Almost anyone can learn to code.
Coding is simply giving a machine a bunch of instructions to iteratively solve *little* problems. You then do this again and again, and again. These little problems combine to be the solution for a bigger problem. Individual coders don't need to solve the big problem usually.
Coding instructions aren't complicated either, and I mean all of them. They are all tremendously straightforward. If A, then B. While X, do Y. If you can understand the idea of storing a value and those two things, you can code.
Read 10 tweets
9 Aug
Heritability is one of the more misunderstood and misused terms in referring to human traits.

It's also a really strange concept in a modern sense, but this paper is a great explainer.
First, heritability is a claim about a specific group in a specific environment. It tells you nothing about any individual in the group. Add/remove people from the group or change the environment and the statistic would change.
Height is probably one of the better understood complex human traits from a genetics standpoint, and serves as a good example for explaining how heritability is often misunderstood.
Read 8 tweets
10 Jul
"one firing silences 200 more from fear"

If we assume each racist speech/act affects 1 person, then I'd be quite happy with 1 person losing their job to save 200 people from dealing with racism.

I'm sad about the job loss, but the benefits as outlined seem pretty good.
One thing I appreciate about the recent cancel culture conversations is people are being more explicit in their ideals. I evaluate bigotry primarily from the perspective of those impacted by it. How much racism am I willing to take to make people feel free to sprout it? Not much.
I want racists to be afraid. I want them to know that if their friends, family, and co-workers heard their views they would at minimum be disappointed in them, and even better, they'd face social repercussions. Racism isn't just some difference of ideas like tax rates.
Read 6 tweets
1 Jul
Famous hereditarian Arthur Jensen found that <70 IQ (intellectually disabled) white kids acted "abnormally" while black kids with the same score act "normal"

Instead of questioning the metric, they just decided that black folks adapted well to being intellectually disabled.
Many hereditarians will tell you they consider 16% of African Americans and 50% of Africans to be intellectually disabled (old term was mentally ret*rd*d). I simply didn't realize that many just believe we function differently under that designation.
I honestly didn't know this was a thing. I've been in a couple conversations lately where it seemed like a struggle to get a hereditarian to say things which were logical consequences of their positions.

I had no idea there was this huge logical hole sitting right there
Read 6 tweets
28 May
"cancelling the Amy Coopers of this world will not help the future George Floyds."

I agree with this take on a complex issue. People are lashing out at a larger system that they don't feel they can reach by disproportionately punishing some individuals.
The challenge is getting to an alternative that goes to the core of the issue. In a sense these things are moving in the right direction. For all the complaints about some of the excesses of white anti-racists, it's a good problem to have, one that can be adjusted.
But even that process of increasing the number of white anti-racists, working with them, and aiming together at things that can make real and significant differences in the lives of those impacted by that overall system is a long process, and people are rightfully impatient.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!