"'Absolutely No Allegations of Any Fraud': Pa. Court Rejects Trump Campaign's Appeal Over 69 Mail-In Ballots," via @ColinKalmbacher lawandcrime.com/2020-election/… via @lawcrimenews
Generally, the replies to this headline fall into two categories:
1) Why was the Trump campaign challenging 69 ballots in Bucks County, Pa.?
2) "Nice."
Let's explain how the ballot challenge broke down to that number.
1) Why was the Trump campaign challenging 69 ballots in Bucks County, Pa.?
2) "Nice."
Let's explain how the ballot challenge broke down to that number.
From today's ruling:
This was the number of ballots originally subject to the Trump campaigns challenge, broken down by category.
A Supreme Court of Pa. ruling in a separate-but-related case took care of the first three categories.
Team Trump withdrew 4 and 6.
Leaving...
This was the number of ballots originally subject to the Trump campaigns challenge, broken down by category.
A Supreme Court of Pa. ruling in a separate-but-related case took care of the first three categories.
Team Trump withdrew 4 and 6.
Leaving...
Even before it was whittled down to those 69 ballots, notice how paltry the Trump campaign's actual challenge was when compared to POTUS-elect Joe Biden's certified margin of victory: 80,555.
Of course, Pa. courts are quite different than the Keystone State's Wyndham Inns.
“Importantly, the Court must point out that there are absolutely no allegations of any fraud, impropriety, misconduct, or undue influence," the judge noted.
“Importantly, the Court must point out that there are absolutely no allegations of any fraud, impropriety, misconduct, or undue influence," the judge noted.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
