1/ Reading "The WEIRDest People in the World: How the West Became Psychologically Peculiar and Particularly Prosperous" by Joseph Henrich
The first thing that strikes me is the idea that in addition to many psychological studies having serious replication problems
2/ the author found that even well designed studies have: "Massively biased samples: Most of what was known experimentally about human psychology and behavior was based on studies with undergraduates from Western societies.
3/ At the time, 96 percent of experimental participants were drawn from northern Europe, North America, or Australia, and about 70 percent of these were American undergraduates."
This leads to biases the author and his research associates dub
4/ “W.E.I.R.D.” because they came from societies that are Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic." and that those of us who were socialized in these environments have strikingly different personalities than people who were not.
5/ The author states: "Unlike much of the world today, and most people who have ever lived, we WEIRD people are highly individualistic, self-obsessed, control-oriented, nonconformist, and analytical." which is very much at odds with the majority of people socialized in different
6/ cultures. The author then switches gears a bit and argues--persuasively-- that "culture can change people biologically independent of any genetic differences. Culture can and does alter our brains, hormones, and anatomy, along with our
7/ perceptions, motivations, personalities, emotions, and many other aspects of our minds."He uses what physically happens to the brain when people become highly literate and how a rising literacy rate materially affected first our brains physically and then our culture as a
8/ a whole, arguing it demonstrated positive forward compounding for "WEIRD" people and cultures.
Lots to think about in just the first 2 chapters of the book and it generates lots of questions about things I've believed and written about--so, onward, this should be a fun read
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We left off with how the ability to challenge consensus reality could be a horrible or great thing, depending upon where society finds itself at the time. Generally, the more open and free a society,
2/ the greater the impact of people who challenge the conventional wisdom. One of the reasons why my Prover always finds free markets superior to other systems is because they have provided the lion’s share of new things and ideas. This wasn’t always so,
3/ and for certain regions ruled by Fundamentalist political or religious beliefs, *still* isn’t so.
When we study history, we see that before the connected computer age, consensus reality changed very slowly and often was extremely hostile to anyone who injected new ideas
1/ "Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habits; thought is anarchic and lawless, indifferent to authority, careless of the well-tried wisdom of the ages."
~Bertrand Russell
2/ Everyone who thinks must face the scary question of: Why?
Why are we here, there *must* be some grand scheme, some huge meaning to life.
So asked Buddha, Marcus Aurelius, Lao Tzu, Jesus Christ, William Shakespeare, Walt Whitman, et al. "What is the grand purpose?"
3/ There must be complex answers for this complex question!
Whole industries, academies, universities, philosophies, religions are there with the right answer, right?
Um, probably not.
Life and these institutions and philosophies have great, almost infinite pre-packaged
So why is being aware of this software “glitch” in our HumanOS useful? I believe that understanding it can help you immeasurably in both understanding yourself and other people.
The first observation is that while many can see this process
2/ clearly in *other* people, they passionately believe that it does not affect them.
If you’re a human being, it DOES affect you and realizing that can help you out of the conundrum it causes all of us.
3/ “ A good way to discover your shortcomings,” said the Master, “ is to observe what irritates you in others.”
~Anthony de Mello
But before we turn to self-examination, let’s look at some other ways understanding this process can help us
“The unexamined life, said Socrates, is not worth living. That’s some serious shit. Most people wouldn’t want to examine that statement, much less their own lives.”
~Jed McKenna
2/ “We say “seeing is believing,” but actually, as Santayana pointed out, we are all much better at believing than at seeing. In fact, we are seeing what we believe nearly all the time and only occasionally seeing what we can’t believe.”
~Robert Anton Wilson
3/ "People consistently overrate their own skill, honesty, generosity, and autonomy…They chalk up their successes to skill and their failures to luck, and always feel that the other side has gotten a better deal in a compromise.”
~Steven Pinker
1/ Since I reread most of the "Tao Te Ching" by Lao Tzu today, I thought the timing of revisiting How the Tao can help you when contemplating the Dow would be auspicious:
1/ "Your success isn’t about you and your performance. It’s about us and how we perceive your performance...Or, to put it simply, your success is not about you, it’s about us...success is a collective phenomenon rather than an individual one...
2/ The most successful among us have mastered our networks, using them to achieve a place in the collective consciousness, snapping up valuable real estate in the brains of unlikely people. In other words, the network found him useful and chose to amplify his success."
3/ This composite quote is from Albert-László Barabási's book "The Formula: The Universal Laws of Success" and gets at a central reason why I believe that distributed intelligence networks like Twitter have given talented people a huge and new advantage to present their