Does anybody actually know what the "illegal consent judgment" in Georgia is that Trump and his leagle weasels keep complaining about?
Would you like to? Because the detail is in that latest Georgia complaint, and it's stupider than even I expected
Would you like to? Because the detail is in that latest Georgia complaint, and it's stupider than even I expected
Here's what Georgia law required - signatures on absentee ballots were to be checked against an electronic signature file and if the signature wasn't a close enough match the ballot had to be rejected. Now here's what the consent judgment said: 
"when you think a signature doesn't match, have two other people check your work. If both of them overrule you, keep the ballot. If one of them agreed with you, reject it"
That's it. That's the whole thing
That's it. That's the whole thing
Look, this stuff is stupid and dead in the water anyway; Georgia voters have no standing to bring these claims and you can't wait until after you lose the election to challenge procedures in place for 8 months. But even if none of that were true, this is embarrassing
Your... your complaint is that Georgia agreed to procedures for signature confirmation? When all the law said was "do signature confirmation" and left the procedures to the election officials' discretion? What even is this?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
