Having bought into Trump, who would want to return to 2016 but this time without Trump? He's been the best experience in their lives, politically. rand.org/blog/2016/01/r…
Take a look at this brilliant George Saunders piece from 2016. It's even more amazing at this end of the experience. newyorker.com/magazine/2016/…
We narrowly missed losing our democracy entirely in this election. If we want not to lose it in the next four years, this essay is a very good place to start. newyorker.com/magazine/2016/…
Back to Saunders, writing in 2016. Bear in mind that 60% of Americans are in the bottom 60% of their high school class, and always will be: that's the political fact that our politics obscures, as does a 'meritocratic' economy. newyorker.com/magazine/2016/…
The fact that Saunders in 2016 and David Brooks in 2020 have written essentially the same paragraph should be a reminder to read this piece, an exegesis of everything in that dual paragraph. @rabbilerner uses 8900 words, probably b/c he wants it to stick. tikkun.org/the-psychopath…
If we're hoping that the Democratic coalition can continue to rely on the racism of the GOP to build an intact majority, remember that Trump *increased* his share of votes from minorities in 2020. Why would that be? An explainer from earlier this year: newrepublic.com/article/156000…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Two things that do not seem likely to fit into the future, at least at a scale that fits the 2C target: carbon capture and flying. To hear more about that, interview people who may know better. It's not like the people to talk to are hiding.
What's interesting about that stat is that the richest 1% are also the best-educated 1%.
Ways that those of us in the richest, best-educated 1% of the world proceed without changing:
"It's the corporations"
"Carbon footprints are a plot invented by corporations"
"I'm investing in [direct air capture] [kelp] [solar radiation management]"
Also, newsflash: most bright people in America work for a corporation. (One or the other.) Most corporations would gladly support a QAnon candidate. Does this mean most bright Americans support QAnon? 🤔
(I'm holding out the thin reed that bright Americans can get their sh*t together.)
We could disassociate his belief system from his education, but I'm not sure that's accurate. The president of his university is on the right: chronicle.com/article/larry-…
In other news, $19T is real money!
Between that and spawning a graduate who helps foster QAnon, @Harvard is having an epic couple of decades. harvardpolitics.com/harvard/the-dr…
I would say, with respect, that @NIHDirector doesn't get either the elites or the ordinary folk that are served by not wearing masks, and their drives are just as natural as his.
For much of Western history, if you were rich, government was either something you controlled or, if you faced the risk of not controlling it, attempted to destroy in order to remove the threat to your wealth.