On #ConstitutionDay2020, let's go back to Constituent Assembly Debates when fiscal provisions of the Constitution were debated. Last 5 minutes of the day were remaining & the President asked if anyone wants to speak. One Mr. K. Santhanam seized the opportunity. (1/n)
He made an important point on the financial relation b/w Centre & States. As if having a premonition, he made the famous "beggars at the door of the Centre" remark. Of course, the context was different but the concerns remain relevant even today - GST, tax devolution, etc. (2/n)
Recent difficulties faced by States are actually forcing the States to be "beggars at the door of the Centre". Santhanam's prophecy has been fulfilled. What was opposed during the debates has been made part of the working of the constitution now. #ConstitutionDay2020 (3/3)
As a side note, Mr. Santhanam headed the Santhanam Committee which resulted in creation of CVC in 1960s.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lets take a little walk through the history of reporting of decisions to understand this phenomenon (now rendered obsolete). The practise of reporting decisions through private law journals has thrived ever since the establishment of legal system in British India. 1/n
The initiative was taken by lawyers & judges in furtherance to the theory of precedent. One can find law reports from 1774 (SC at Cal) through the Sadar Adalats to the HCs in 1860s. Please remember all of this was through private enterprising lawyers & judges.
2/n
Then came a tactonic shift in 1875 when at the instance of Sir James F Stephens, the Indian Law Reports Act was passed. He was responsible for codification of Indian laws, more famously for Indian Evidence Act, 1872. 3/n