Barrett casts the fifth vote to lift COVID restrictions on houses of worship in NY. Roberts dissents.

The new five-justice ultraconservative majority takes shape for the first time.
Aside from the outcome, what’s most remarkable here is the brawl between Gorsuch and Roberts. Gorsuch attacks Roberts head-on, accusing him of trying to “shelter in place when the Constitution is under attack.” Roberts responds with a withering attack on Gorsuch’s candor.
Gorsuch (left) plays amateur scientist, saying NY must open houses of worship if it opens liquor stores and bike shops. Sotomayor (right), citing the actual science, says Gorsuch is playing “a deadly game in second guessing the expert judgment of health officials.”
Here’s Sotomayor reminding everybody that the Supreme Court’s alleged vigilance against religious discrimination did not extend to Trump’s “Muslim ban.”
This footnote from Sotomayor sums up the case. The Supreme Court just blocked NY COVID restrictions on houses of worship *that are not even in effect right now* because infections have slowed. But now, if infections rise again, NY will be powerless to impose new restrictions.
Five justices wrote separate opinions in this case, but who remained silent? Amy Coney Barrett, who cast the decisive fifth vote blocking NY’s covid restrictions. A smart strategic move to stay out of the spotlight even though she made all the difference. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
Here’s Roberts’ full response to Gorsuch, which includes a defense of the three liberal justices (whose integrity Gorsuch impugns). It’s a pretty devastating retort. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
I have no idea what Gorsuch was thinking when he lit into the Chief Justice like that. It is a huge tactical error for Gorsuch to bite Roberts’ head off in a nasty opinion accusing him of betraying his judicial obligations. Snide, petty rhetoric unbecoming of a SCOTUS justice.
At the same time, this decision marks the beginning of a new era in which Roberts’ vote doesn’t really matter. The five ultraconservative justices can do whatever they want without him—as they just demonstrated. Maybe Gorsuch is simply rubbing that fact in Roberts’ face.
Here’s what we know for sure: It’s now open season on COVID restrictions at the Supreme Court. Churches around the country will challenge these rules and win. The days of COVID limits on church attendance are ending—just as we enter a dangerous new phase of infections.
And don’t forget: This radical shift in the Supreme Court’s view on COVID restrictions is attributable entirely to Amy Coney Barrett.

It’s a new day at SCOTUS. The Constitution is in the hands of five justices to the right of John Roberts. We are in serious trouble.
The investment is already paying off.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Joseph Stern

Mark Joseph Stern Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mjs_DC

23 Nov
Good morning! The Supreme Court will issue orders at 9:30 a.m.😅
I see nothing major in the Supreme Court's orders this morning. No action on cases involving the election or COVID. No new grants. A quiet day.
Small note: Justice Kagan recused herself from the consideration of three cases in today's orders list, presumably because she was involved somehow while solicitor general ... a position she left more than 10 years ago.
Read 4 tweets
20 Nov
🚨11th Circuit rules that bans on anti-LGBTQ "conversion therapy" violate the First Amendment. 2–1 decision, both judges in the majority appointed by Trump. A really awful and frightening decision. media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/f…
Note that these bans only apply to minors and licensed counselors. Not clergy or private citizens. And lawmakers found that trying to change a child's sexual orientation or gender identity is extremely harmful and dangerous. The 11th Circuit's Trump judges don't care.
This is what Rule By Trump Judges looks like: We are not allowed to shield LGBTQ youth from discredited "conversion therapy," even though it increases risk of suicide.

Trump judges won't let LGBTQ people protect our own communities, our own children, from harm. Sickening.
Read 7 tweets
13 Nov
Alito is delivering the keynote speech at this year’s Federalist Society convention. He’s using the occasion to defend the group, claiming its members face “harassment and retaliation for saying anything that departs from the law school orthodoxy.”
Alito attacks the Judicial Conference for attempting to forbid federal judges from being members of the Federalist Society, and praises the conservative judges who successfully fought the ban.
UHHH, Alito seems to be criticizing governors for issuing “sweeping restrictions” in response to COVID-19. Also criticizes progressives and New Dealers for putting too much faith in scientists and experts.
Read 17 tweets
10 Nov
Brett Kavanaugh just said “I tend to agree” that the ACA’s (zeroed out) individual mandate can be severed from the rest of the law. Unless he’s bluffing—which is possible!—that probably means the ACA is saved.
My guess at this stage: The six conservative justices find the individual mandate unconstitutional. (Which will be ridiculous, but whatever.)

Then a majority (maybe 5–4?) will just sever the individual mandate from the rest of the ACA, which will have no impact on anyone.
Here’s the full Kavanaugh quote. If he really means it, that’s the ballgame.
Read 7 tweets
10 Nov
The Supreme Court will hear arguments at 10 a.m. in a case seeking to eradicate the Affordable Care Act. The Trump administration, along with 18 Republican attorneys general, have asked the court to abolish the entire law, stripping health insurance from about 23 million people.
The Republican coalition challenging the ACA claim that Congress secretly sabotaged the law by zeroing out the penalty for those who lack health insurance in 2017.

It is a fatuous, bad-faith argument, and the lawyers who took it to SCOTUS should be ashamed of themselves.
The theory that Congress somehow destroyed the entire ACA when it *removed the penalty for uninsured people* is, in legal terms, unadulterated horse shit. But a notoriously partisan federal judge endorsed it, and the 5th Circuit refused to say he was wrong. That’s why we’re here.
Read 4 tweets
10 Nov
Republicans are helping Trump create a harrowing atmosphere of very real, deep fear that he might stage a coup. I feel it, too. But there is no substance behind his theatrics. There are no remotely plausible scenarios in which he will prevail. He will leave office on Jan. 20.
I am intensely pessimistic about everything related to Trump. But none of his lawsuits stand a chance of overturning the outcome of this election. Yes, even with THIS Supreme Court. Trump’s delegitimization of the election may have horrific consequences. But he will leave office.
And to be clear, I absolutely believe there were scenarios in which Trump could steal the election. I wrote about them! But we are not in one. We aren’t even close. The recent actions of Trump and the GOP are truly odious—banana republic stuff. But they won’t work. He will leave.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!