David Roberts Profile picture
26 Nov, 12 tweets, 3 min read
Sorry, commenters, you're wrong: Rise of Skywalker is the worst Star Wars movie & the worst movie of the modern era. The prequels were extremely bad, but TRoS was extremely bad in a *worse way*. It was the worst in the worst way one can be worst.
The sequels were bad in a "auteur with no ear for dialogue & no feeling for actors is given way too much money & freedom & creates a towering, relentlessly clunky, narratively overpacked oddity." I don't wanna watch them, but I can forgive, or at least live with, them.
TRoS is bad in a grubby corporate way. No concern for the canon, narrative coherence, creativity or novelty -- just an exercise in how many familiar tropes can be crammed in, how many times the worn-out nostalgia button can be pushed. Fan service for the absolute worst fans.
Not a single scene is given room to breathe. The story, what there is of it, isn't shown, it's told in rushed, cursory exposition. "Oh, you need the mcguffin, but to find that you have to find this secret other mcguffin." Ok, I guess?
It was nothing so much as a long list of previous SW tropes for Abrams to dutifully replicate. Lando? OK. Ship flies through tight tunnels, pursued by tie fighters? OK. Large exotic space creature almost eats ship? OK. On & on, just cramming them in w/ no care, no coherence.
And the fucking editing, Jesus. Chop chop chop chop. I don't think there was a single shot in the entire film that lasted more than a second or two. No time to sit with anything, absorb anything, FEEL anything, got lots more tropes to get to! It's edited like a 2-hour trailer.
Oh, the fan boys were butt hurt that Luke went cynical? We'll just crudely reverse that. They were angry Rey was a nobody? We'll just crudely make her somebody. They were angry Kylo Ren was ambivalent & ambiguous? We'll just crudely turn him good, don't worry about the details.
TRoS is what happens when people w/ no understanding of what made SW appealing in the first place get ahold of it. To them it's just IP to be put in a blender & recycled again & again. Anything new or novel, any actual new story, might kill their golden goose.
In the end, sure, fanboys got every scrap of SW nostalgia they could possibly want, with nothing to challenge them or make them think or make them uncomfortable for even a brief moment. Like a back alley hand job -- gets it done, but does anyone feel good about it afterward?
I have been deeply immersed in SW since I was 5 & saw the first movie. It shaped my youth. Even through the prequels, even through VII & VIII, I *cared*. IX did something I thought was impossible: it broke the spell. I just don't give a shit any more. Meh to all of it.</fin>
Hm? What's that? Oh, I thought you said GRIPESgiving!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Roberts

David Roberts Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drvox

27 Nov
Among the many reasons this is horseshit, this whole genre of liberal-scolding rests on the premise that the offended heartlanders are responding to what Dems actually say -- the intramural debates in which people like Dowd are involved. They're not!
By & large, Trump's base has no idea what Dems actually say or do. They are responding to a ludicrous caricature they see on RW media (& RW social media). They are responding to lies & conspiracy theories. Dems changing how they talk *won't change any of that*.
Read 5 tweets
27 Nov
Just got done reading The Cold Millions, the newish book by @1JessWalter. It is set amidst the labor struggles of the early 20th century, out west (Spokane & Seattle). It hit me so hard; then as now, the fight for social justice is bloody & frustrating & often seems futile.
But it also shows that all these futile actions, all these frustrations & lost battles, somehow, over time, add up to progress, thanks to people who fight no matter what, even in the face of violence & loss. Couldn't be more timely.
Should also add: it's a fantastic read! I'd place it a notch beneath Beautiful Ruins (my favorite audiobook ever), but completely worth your time. bookshop.org/books/the-cold…
Read 4 tweets
23 Nov
Here's a thing I wrote about America's new climate ambassador, John Kerry, back when he was just running a climate advocacy group. vox.com/energy-and-env…
I think it's great that Kerry is in this role but, let's be honest, there's no human on earth who can spin or fool other world leaders about the US & climate at this point. They know our promises are good ONLY until another Republican is elected.
What can he tell them? Yes, Biden will issue climate rules via executive authority, like Obama did; he'll say the right things & be a productive negotiating partner, like Obama was. But, just like with Obama, all that work could easily be nuked in 2024, like it never happened.
Read 4 tweets
22 Nov
Wow, I didn't expect much from this podcast ("not a monolith," ok, we get it!) but it turned out to be a total mind blower. @IanHaneyLopez cuts through the "woke vs. shut-up-about-woke" debate in an incredibly productive & thoughtful way. Recommended. stitcher.com/show/the-ezra-…
One insight I wish everyone on the left could hear: the anti-racist message of siding with the oppressed & dispossessed is NOT necessarily appealing to all of the vast category of people we call "people of color." It's certainly not *automatically* appealing.
At the same time, "moderates" need to hear that racial messaging is not some separate thing from economics. The most appealing message, in surveys, is that *rich people are using race to divide & screw working people*.
Read 5 tweets
21 Nov
I used to wonder, "what level of threat would rouse the institutional Democratic Party to actually FIGHT, fight like desperate people willing to do anything to save their country?" It's become pretty clear that there is no such level of threat. They'll politely watch it go under.
The lesson the Dem gerontocracy learned from impeachment is that it was unpopular. It lost them votes. It reaffirmed their priors that fighting back is a losing proposition. None of them reflected on how we've ended up in a social/media environment where that could happen ...
... where an openly criminal scumbag president could loot the country & the public could so fully & profoundly misunderstand the situation that they see impeachment as "partisan squabbling." Instead they just accept the polls & herd in the other direction.
Read 6 tweets
21 Nov
Let's look at a little vignette of today's GOP. @LindseyGrahamSC committed what amounts to felony voter fraud on behalf of Trump: slate.com/news-and-polit…
When news of Graham's fraud got out, prominent Democrats called for him to resign. He then used those calls to promote himself to the Trump base.
Two things worth noting about this. First, the message: there are no real rules, no neutral referees. No one *really* cares about principles. There's only a zero-sum competition. To be a loyal member of one's side is to do ANYTHING, illegal or not, to help it win. Anything.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!