1/ This Black Lives Matter protest happened in the middle of the pandemic and the woke/media/blue-check industrial complex cheered it on.
Now they want to close churches and shutdown thanksgiving.
I called for lockdowns in march and I'm infuriated.
2/ In March I worked for a government in Canada that implemented testing, tracing, capcity limits on indoor gatherings, and social distancing.
These measures work and allowed us to re-open churches, synagogues, mosques, and small businesses back in *JULY*
We have stayed open.
3/ In light of a recent surge, the government mandated masks in public.
I support this.
As a result of these measures number of confirmed active cases is less than .1%.
Churches and synagogues contiue to *REMAIN OPEN* (with some limits on capacity)
So, why am I angry?
4/ I'm *ANGRY* because prominent members of the medical community have undermined established medical science and destroyed its credibility by playing favorites, selective rule enforcement, granting exemptions for ideological reasons, and otherwise engaging in rank hypocrisy.
5/ They flood the zone with urgent warnings and media panic when small businesses open at 30% capacity or when Churches or snyagogues meet, and they demand these people stay home and shame them for leaving the house unnecessarily.
Then they cheer BLM rallies that look like this:
6/ The same medical experts who now warn about small businesses, churches, and synagogues while shaming those who might attend a service, have spent months telling us mass protests of thousands of people must continue:
7/ Here, @s_j_prins, a professor at @ColumbiaMSPH says public health needs to "pick a side," then he changes a medical advice graphic for police and protestors so it offers advice to protestors and tells police to stay home. He then says "defund, disarm, and abolish" the police.
8/ Julia Marcus responds. She's worried people may blame the protestors for spreading COVID. She then admits one question she asks when she gives advice is....
"Does it help us build power?"
She admits making public health recommendations based on what helps her side get power.
8/ We need the help of experts in order to make good decisions and set good policy.
But we need experts to be honest within their area of expertise, and not to use their position of authority to make policy that shows favoritism to whoever agrees with those experts politics.
9/ When experts use technical knowledge as an excuse to make policies which force their political and moral values on the rest of us, it erodes the trust people have in both experts and the medical and scientific institutions that teach, train, and give experts their legitimacy.
10/ This means the medical establishment and their media enablers have mortgaged the credibility, legitimacy, and trust of the scientific and medical establishment in order to pay for the temporary high of political power and social activism.
And we're all paying for it.
11/ The social capital that scientists, universities, experts and the media rely on to do their job is *TRUST*
They lose a little bit of that capital every time those of us who rely on them to run our lives find out we've been lied to.
12/ So now, when I say that masks work, that social distancing is effective, that we need to stop the spread; people just look me right in the eye and say "If the experts really believed that they wouldn't have promoted massive protest rallies:
13/ When I say to not to travel, or to avoid eat in restaurants because of the government policy, the people just say "if politicians really believed their own policy they would follow it. But they don't follow it because they don't really believe it."
And they show me this:
14/ It's now looks like the institutions we used to rely on to give us accurate information to make decisions about the policies we want and how to manage ourselves, are not telling us the whole truth because if we had the whole truth we might not pick their preferred policies.
15/ People believe, and I understand why, that the institutions we rely on for accurate information are selling them a narrative cobbled together from half-truths, in order to justify decisions and rules that benefit the politics of the woke/media/blue-check industrial complex.
16/ What am I supposed to say when someone tells me "this COVID stuff is all just political nonsense meant to benefit whoever's in charge" and then scientists brag about how they are politicizing science?
Why would anyone listen to them?
17/ The woke/media/blue-check industrial complex exchanged truth telling for narrative crafting in a bid to implement their political and moral worldview.
This isn't just The Death of Expertise, It's The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy.
/fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The left painted Christianity as a cringy, outdated, stuffy, religion of oppressors, so now leftist women looking for faith are picking the only religion they're allowed to like (Islam codes as brown so it can't be criticized), even though it makes the handmaids tale look tame.
Women on the left outnumber men on the left by a HUGE majority, and refuse to date right wing men. So a huge number of leftist women are therefore competing for a tiny number of leftist men. So Leftist women have almost no leverage when negotiating the terms of a relationship...
And because leftist women have adopted feminist liberation and consent morality, they have no morally consistent way to demand that men commit to them or settle down; as long as everything is consensual, leftist women have no moral grounds to demand men stop "dating around"...
2/ There is a difference between a recession and stagflation. A recession is just when an economy shrinks, and you usually get high unemployment and low productivity.
Recessions are bad, (no one likes unemployment) but they're nothing compared to the monster known as STAFLATION
3/ Stagflation is when you get a combinations of high inflation, high unemployment, stagnant growth, and lower productivity. And that combination of inflation, low productivity/growth and unemployment leaves the government with no good policy options for solving it because...
This kind of joke is becoming popular on the left, and I think it's because on a subconscious level they know they're all just using social justice as an excuse to create theories they can tactically deploy to grab the upper hand in social situations.
Whenever they don't get what they want they invoke social justice discourses (feminism, Critical Race Theory, BLM, decolonization, etc) as a way to get the moral leverage they need to get the upper hand in whatever interaction they are having
And they do this constantly in interpersonal interactions and personal relationships, where they invoke social justice jargon in order to grab moral authority within the conversation so they can get what they want.
The biggest problem with letting illegal immigrants stay is that it is unjust. Why does nobody make this simple point?
It is unjust to ask immigrants who come legally to work for years to become citizens while letting those who enter illegally to be rewarded with citizenship.
When there is a set clear of fair rules for how immigration is to be done in a in orderly fashion, it is unjust to allow illegal immigrants to break the rules, skip to the front of the line, and then be rewarded with visas or citizenship just because left wing activists demand it
It is unjust to allow illegal immigrants to be rewarded for breaking the law and skipping to the front of the line. It doesn't matter if you feel empathy for the person doing the law breaking and the line skipping - it is unjust to reward that person with residency in the country
Leftists are having a tough time with Venezuelans celebtrating Maduro's arrest and the persians overthrowing Irans Islamic regime, because it means the people are rejecting both the communist and islamic halves of the leftists new islamo-communist/third world marxist coalition.
The left wanted to harnass the energy around the palestinian issue and use it to advance western marxism. So, they created an alliance between western marxist activists and Islamic fundamentalists/Hamas supporters using third-world marxism and postcolonial theory as the bridge.
They thought by getting the popular support of global south "subaltern" third-world groups, along with the support of the Islamic world, they would have a coalition big enough the challenge the United States, and which they would control by virtue of having organized it.
1/ The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) created a DEI program focused on:
-Power, privilege, and oppression
-Understanding microaggressions
-Centering Native Voices in Atmospheric Sciences
-Knowledge that "does not come from science"
2/ The NCAR had two programs. The first was called UNIEON (which stands for "UCAR/NCAR Equity and Inclusion program"), and the second was a program they funded called "rising voices," which was about bringing "indigenous knowledge" into science.
And it's funded by tax dollars.
3/ The goal of the DEI program (UNIEON) was to bring DEI into the NCAR, and then get the participants to start implementing the DEI ideology via "Bystander intervention." That is, it invites people to insert themselves into other peoples social interactions in order to spread DEI