While Trump rages against the press and refuses to concede, Javanka appear eager to get on with what they are sure is Trump's loss. These two were among the first to ask Trump to concede and it's irrelevant if Trump's supporters don't believe that 1/ nytimes.com/2020/11/24/us/…
So while Trump does his thing, Javanka are already looking on to life beyond the White House, having thoroughly hijacked and derailed a whole presidential term, because these two are as transactional as it gets 2/
And they made sure to use the White House to build their own portfolios and grow their own networks and establish themselves as political players and build up their cronies 3/
So something Trump supporters should consider, though I think the focus on electoral fraud will prevent many of them from considering, is this: if Trump miraculously reverses the course of the election and simply brings these two back into the fold, what changes? 4/
Trump said just before November that if he wins Jared is a hero. Trump supporters are marching in the streets, getting into fights with BLM/antifa while cops look on and do nothing. Meanwhile, these two tell dad to quit with a sigh and an eyeroll 5/
If Trump ends up staying in the White House or if he is evicted and becomes GOP kingmaker on the outside, how forgiving will Trump's supporters be of this? 6/
This is not a small issue. If you think that these two (Kushner more so) did not alter and disrupt the movement that began in 2016, you haven't been paying attention, and if you're only response is to say "fake news," then you're doing their work for them 7/
Kushner is part of the Wall Street wing in the WH that hates Trump's base. Carrying water for that is just lame brained 8/
The important thing here, more than the individuals involved, is the need for movements capable of self criticism, i.e., if Trump supporters cannot say "We did all this work for you now you need to do this for us," but instead just Plan Trusts, that's indicative of a problem 9/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Consider: What prevents us from being able to "deal with it" is conservatism. Hate affluent liberal citadels all you want, it is conservatism that places the GDP on a pedestal and, in the name of the free market or something, refuses to assail these citadels where it hurts 1/
Want to own the libs? Aggressively attack the practice of global labor arbitrage, abolish visa workers programs, raise taxes on liberal plutocrats, i.e., do exactly the opposite of what conservatism says you should do 2/
Trump hasn't been good at this at all, see constant GDP/stock market tweets, but you can argue that at least he occasionally if unwittingly pointed in the right direction, but it will ultimately be on us to consciously, deliberately separate from conservatism 3/
Milovan followed James Burnham's method from the left and it shows in his analysis of communism (really just political bureaucracy) not as a theory but as a system. He is not concerned with formal principles but real power structures 1/
I think the historic left is better at this than the right/conservatives due to the left generally being more associated with materialism and the right generally looking to the transcendent 2/
As a result the left generally has a better pathology of power than the right, which instead tends to debate formal principles and theories 3/
"Charges of unfairness are serious," Judge Stephanos Bibas wrote. "But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here." Bibas is a Trump appointee. washingtontimes.com/news/2020/nov/…
One indicator that Trump, and his base, had entered troubled waters was when the GOP's scam judicial strategy was celebrated as serious "America First" policy. But "conservative" judges and the courts won't save you...
The judicial strategy gives conservatives the illusion that courts and judges provide them with a safety net while providing Republican politicians with an excuse for not actually legislating. "Vote for us so we can appoint more judges!" When that became "MAGA," it was a bad omen
They are the biggest victims of interracial violence and police shootings yet perennially play the part of public enemy numero uno 2/
They are the butt of every joke, they are not allowed to celebrate their heroes and symbols and myths, but are contioned to worship the "Other" instead and denigrate and ignore what is theirs 3/
Ah, so this justifies a foreign policy of bombing and invading as many countries as possible and selling weapons to the Saudis so they can exterminate Yemenis. Because the Holocaust and stuff
2. It's Mother Jones but this is also a GOP talking point, which includes many pro-Trump pundits. A byproduct of "Trumpism" corrupted Jared Kushner and Brooke Rollins is that Trumpism 2020 embraced a version of Democratic Party identity politics
Sure, all politics are tied to identity, but what I mean is that the GOP has connected itself to a specific, toxic variation of identity politics, i.e., "get off the plantation," which makes a kind of religious antiracism a staple of the GOP