1/ If u wouldn't spend time/energy reaching out to folk who believe Pizzagate BS or that the DNC killed Seth Rich or Obama isn't American, why would you spend time/energy reaching out to those who think Trump 'won in a landslide' but the election was stolen? All are irrational...
2/ Literally every second you waste trying to bring these people to the light of reason is a second you could be spending organizing those who already lean progressive, or at least comprise the current anti-Trump coalition into more progressive formations...
3/ I will never understand the irrational faith in the power of pure reason so common among typical liberals. The idea that if we just show people the facts, the data, or put together the right class analysis, they'll switch and vote their "self interest"...
4/ To begin with, in their minds they ARE voting their interests: their caste interests (as Isabel Wilkerson explains in her brilliant book Caste), which trump (no pun intended) their class interests....
5/ These caste interests include whiteness of course -- and continued white hegemony -- but also "traditional" masculinity, Christianity, heteronormativity, etc. The caste system makes their actions entirely understandable. Caste is property. Caste-ism has broken their brains...
6/ Can some be saved from that? Yes. But not by some massive effort expended for that purpose. Some will wake up because of personal crisis, a "come to Jesus" moment that happens when they least expect it...but not likely bc of any deliberate planned effort by progressives...
7/ And even if such efforts could work, the question is, is THAT the way to spend our time? Conversion narratives? How about mobilization narratives, for the already progressive-minded? Innoculation narratives for the uninitiated?...
8/ Fact is, the anti-Trump forces outnumber the pro-Trump forces. Granted, not all the anti-Trump forces are progressive. But THAT'S the place to start working on developing a sustainable progressive base. Not fishing in some toxic pond hoping to reel in a few un-poisoned fish...
9/ Sadly we on the left romanticize reason so much that we think anyone can be brought to it. And we romanticize the white working class historically so we think they're some nascent liberatory force for good. Neither are true...
10/ Irrationality is as common as rationality, perhaps more. And what's rational to some (class interest) pales in comparison to caste interest for others. And white workers have been ODing on the white part so long they mostly cleave to that, rather than class solidarity...
11/ Bottom line: dance with the ones that brung ya...right now, that's 80 million+...from there, build a progressive narrative using a race/class equity combination frame to attract some of the millions of people still not voting at all...
12/ Building upon a narrative of the collective and civic good (an inherently progressive frame that can attract, for different reasons, leftists, progressives, liberals, and even many moderate/centrist folks), we can establish a true base on lasting justice-oriented politics...
13/ As for Trumpers: those who are capable of changing will do so w/o our help. We needn't expend time and energy chasing them or fetishizing their involvement in our coalitions. We just need to be out here pushing for things that would benefit the collective, including them...
14/ And they'll either come to see those things as good or not. They'll either join that movement or not. They'll either vote that way or not. But we sure as shit shouldn't be planning our strategic moves and narratives around what will attract this bunch...
15/ In addition to their irrationality, they're a falling % of the electorate (white folk 35+ and/or w/o college degrees, and/or iving in rural/exurban areas or small towns). We should speak to their needs bc their needs are collective needs. Not bc it will likely flip them...
16/ Govern on behalf of all, including them. But don't pander to them as a strategic choice. It won't work, and doing so would require some core compromising of a commitment to Black and brown folks, a commitment to religious pluralism, gender and sexual equity, etc...END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Grifter @SidneyPowell1 and her Q-addled fan base apparently think that just bc you file a lawsuit w/affidavits from people, that constitutes "evidence" sufficient to invalidate the votes of millions. It doesn't. People can say anything in an affidavit for a court filing...
2/ Punishment for this kind of perjury is mild and not likely anyway, plus in prior such examples already discussed in court in MI and PA, the court found the affidavit claims to be not credible, based on misunderstanding, etc., even if not deliberately deceptive...
3/ Lots of these GOP "poll watchers" skipped the training they were supposed to get first, so they didn't understand the process and how it works...as such they thought things they witnessed that were exactly proper were actually pernicious. Because they're gullible idiots...
1/ The SCOTUS decision in favor of the "religious freedom" to gather in large groups despite the pandemic is part of a larger effort to elevate so called religious liberty above all other freedoms, but not in the way most agree with...
2/ Most everyone would agree that people's right to worship as they see fit should be protected, to believe as they wish, free from persecution, etc. That is not what this is, or what other religious liberty cases are about...
3/ These cases are about elevating the rights of persons claiming to be acting on the basis of religious belief, to engage in activity that injures others, without consequence. So here it means the right to worship in large groups even if it endangers public health...
1/ Let's be honest: how many of you "reasonable" conservatives imploring Dems to reach across the aisle and make nice with Trump voters would have demanded that Trump voters to do the same if he had won? And what are the odds they would have listened to you? Yeah, so...be gone...
2/And if he were to somehow convince GOP state legislatures to submit GOP electors to the EC to steal the election (he won't, but play along), how many of you would demand such GOP ecumenism? Or be in the streets demanding his removal? Gimme a break...
3/ In that scenario Kasich, Santorum & writers like Thiessen & Olsen would be saying they wish he hadn't done it that way but gosh the Constitution allows it, and maybe if the left hadn't talked about the Green New Deal and Medicare 4 All it wouldn't have been necessary but gee..
1/ I've heard some conjuring the notion of restorative justice to suggest we have an obligation to reach out to Trump voters and offer them the opportunity to rejoin the beloved community, to understand them, etc. This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how RJ works...
2/ The concept is not a "get out of jail free" card for one's transgressions. It is not an absolution ticket one can wield so as to let bygones be bygones. RJ requires that those who injure take responsibility and make amends for their actions (in this case injuring so many)...
3/ AND RJ presumes that those who are injured have the primary say over what the transgressor needs to do. So this means that in order to apply RJ to Trump voters they must...
Come on Ian...did they do this in 16 for Clinton supporters? No. Would they have done it for Biden supporters if they'd won this time? No. When we lose, we grieve for those who will be hurt. When they lose, they grieve because they can't keep hurting people the same way...
tired of "being the bigger person," when the smaller people continue to focus on cutting the bigger folks off at the kneecaps...Our ecumenism will not change them or get them to reciprocate, and you cannot point to any real evidence that it will...
I'm not saying be mean to people, obviously. But the idea that the burden is on us to reach out to them? No...they lost. It is their job to figure out why most Americans reject their movement and views...not our job to keep justifying ours
Funny how conservative EC defenders make arguments like this while worshipping the market for reflecting consumer preferences...perhaps people vote with their feet when they choose where to live and that too is "the market." Face it, y'all are RC Cola, and most folks prefer Coke.
The fact that few want to move to the small towns and rural communities that the right fetishizes and thinks should wield outsized influence via the EC says a lot: you think places where people WANT to live should be punished for being in concentrated areas?
there is no other market u would treat this way...demand suggests preference. Hell, even when some of y'all move to red states, you move to the Blue areas bc that's where culture & life are. To wit, Ben Shapiro, Tomi Lahren and Candace Owens all moving to Nashville, NOT rural TN