"Some people say, show yuh evidence. I say, don't show yuh evidence. Keep that to yuhself. You know, keep that—that's fuh you. That's so you know you have a case. You don't need to prove it to anyone else,okay—that's fuh you."
"All ya have to do is get some, like,  loose leaf printuh papuh, okay, and just get some binduhs and then just like hold that up and just say "Affidavits! Signed affidavits!" And that's as good as gold."
"The othuh thing I always like to say is, don't use spell check, because those squiggly lines, they—they'll—they just jittuh and they distract you. So just turn the spell check off."
"And, um, just turn it off, and then it'll be good, because when you file your documents and you have spelling errors, they'll think maybe ya been busy. And they'll put you to the head of the line."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George Conway

George Conway Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gtconway3d

28 Nov
You're lying about the constitution, and lying about the existence of election fraud.
Article II, § 1 does vest in state legislatures the power to determine the manner of selecting presidential electors. Pennsylvania's legislature has done that, having determined long ago that voters get to choose the electors in a general popular election.
That election took place on November 7, and was certified on November 21, in the manner specified by the legislature by statute.
Read 9 tweets
25 Nov
So this brief does a great job of explaining why state legislators cannot now change the rules for appointing electors.
Read 4 tweets
22 Nov
Could some nimble graphics type out there take a T/P 2020 MAGA sign and make it say
"MAKE US LOSE AGAIN" instead. Thx.
Read 4 tweets
20 Nov
So, in its case seeking access to grand jury material for a possible (re)impeachment of @realDonaldTrump, which was scheduled for argument before the Supreme Court on December 2, ...
... the House Judiciary Committee moved to postpone the argument on the ground that @JoeBiden is going to be president on January 20, and, in essence, it would be a waste of time to argue the case, since Trump won't be there to impeach any more.
The Justice Department, which brought the case to SCOTUS (it lost below), basically responded by saying ...🤷🏻‍♂️: Your Honors, do whatever you want.
Read 6 tweets
20 Nov
@ktumulty Theoretically possible but highly unlikely.
@ktumulty If they pulled this stuff in front of a judge, they'd have a decent chance of having their licenses suspended or pulled altogether.
@ktumulty But statements to the public are less often the subject of discipline, and they present the question of whether the statements are protected by the First Amendment.
Read 15 tweets
8 Nov
I can’t get over how mulch amusement this story has brought all of us.
I’m going to hedge and say it’s not certain, but I do think we will be learning more about it very soon.
In the end, this incident will generate quite a number of clippings.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!