Kendi makes sense when he says “Black people don’t exist biologically or behaviorally.” But then he admits they do exist “culturally.” And he loses me when he rejects the legitimacy of making any cultural comparisons at all since they imply hierarchy. 1/
@ 29:00:
Any researcher who asks about cultural deficiencies “must create a cultural standard to answer that question. And once that cultural standard is created, cultural hierarchy is created. And once that culture hierarchy is created, culturally racist ideas are created.” 2/
So the argument is that any cultural critiques are inherently illegitimate or even racist. Each cultire is as good or bad as the next.
This argument is not new but I’m not sure I’ve ever seen it gain such unquestioning mainstream and elite traction.
Americans are in trouble.
The problem with Kendi’s logic is not that judging by standards does not technically introduce hierarchies. It does.
The problem with Kendi’s logic is that it seems to eschew the simple fact that reality (not even just human reality but all reality) is hierarchical.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The hard left––not liberals, to be clear––is fundamentally childlike insofar as it fuels itself and its fury on a vision of some future state of purity that can by necessity never be achieved.
The very foundation of adulthood is the acceptance of compromise and imperfection.
In turn, it's true that the far right fuels itself on a childlike nostalgia for the past perfect states that can never be achieved and in fact never existed either.
Liberals are the genuine adults, yet liberalism is being devoured from the left and right flanks at the moment.
Anyway, interacting this evening with the social media account of the far-left journal @curaffairs was a lot like interacting with one of my children. Just pure detachment from real-world constraints and circumstances.
Earlier today I speculated that the course we’re on will likely see statues of Obama ripped down in the future. The political commentary magazine Current Affairs responds: “lol” obvi. Like it’s not even a question.
What is insane is that, after all is said and done, Donald Trump is going to get more of the black vote than any other Republican in my lifetime. Absolutely bananas.
One thing that gets short shrift in these conversations about the future of journalism is just how, content aside, on the level of craft, a piece at the NYTM, or the New Yorker or Harper’s or Liberties, is made with such a high level of meticulous editing and fact-checking.
Writing a good essay or reported piece requires an extraordinary amount of back and forth with multiple people who try their best to reveal the thing that is trying to be said in its very best form. It requires lots of skeptical pushback, encouragement, polishing, rephrasing...
It’s what makes edited writing so superior to Twitter or what used to be blogging.
It just makes me uneasy when so many people, talented writers, are starting to feel compelled to strike out on their own.