Something very significant and very concerning happened over the weekend which we think encapsulates the real dangers now faced by our democracy and the rule of law.
Embedded in the first version of the ‘Call to action’ was a link to a series of tweets by David Paisley which accused Joanna Cherry of ‘funding a hate group’.
Her crime? Donating to the crowdfunder of @SVPhillimore who is a member of this group.
Both @SVPhillimore and Joanna Cherry, unsurprisingly, complained about this. A combination of concise emails and Ms Cherry’s access to good libel lawyers resulted in a surprisingly swift climb down.
But some necessary questions.
Very concerningly one MP claimed his name had been added to the letter ‘without his knowledge’.
Also the organisation behind this letter appears to be run by a 16 year old trans child who popped up to talk to @SVPhillimore
An account claiming to be Dylan’s father shortly appeared to defend the rather odd actions of this child. This account of Gordon Struth appears to be someone who works for the Scottish Parliament.
So. There we have it. A number of Scottish MPs were prepared to put their name to a ‘Call for Action’ which defamed an SNP politician and encouraged an English woman to be targeted. The organisation behind this appears to be run by a child with the connivance of a parent.
This is the state of our current political debate.
This is how elected politicians seek to deal with matters of importance and significance.
With dirty little games, orchestrated by a child.
Welcome to 2020.
And this really matters. Not just because it makes a mockery of any healthy democratic process, but because it puts women in real fear of being targeted for abuse.
"The Adver has obtained figures through a Freedom of Information request revealing an increase of 1,000 per cent in offences reported to the police from one in 2015 to 11 in 2019 in Swindon."
"Nice Mayor Christian Estrosi said that three people were confirmed dead, and that the attacker repeatedly shouted “Allahu Akbhar,” or “God is greatest” in Arabic."
Are we allowed to discuss the links between terrorism and fundamentalist Islam? Are we allowed to be critical of the Israeli state? Or because this will risk offending some, all discussion is forbidden, even in our own homes?
Why the dogged insistence from the police in focusing on hate ‘crimes’? Do they really mean hate ‘incidents’ - which can simply be recorded without any further action and zero investigation?
While victims of serious crime know they have no redress.
The consequences for a society where people lose confidence in the police are obvious and serious.
In a pub there would presumably be other witnesses. How do you propose evidence is gathered against people in their own homes? You are either proposing to encourage people to inform on their family/friends or authorising covert surveillance.
Next question. Define 'stirring up hatred against Jews' please. What if a guest at a dinner party expressed robust condemnation of the actions of the Israeli State? Does this count? If not - why not?
You want the law extended to cover 'hatred' against transgender people. Do you think @SVPhillimore expresses sufficient 'hatred' here to earn a charge? Many would say she does by simple utterance of the definition of 'woman'.