What the Privy council held that will of the Deity is supreme was the basic feature of Travancore Constitution due to Kingdom donation to Deity and continued to be basic feature of our Constitution u Art 26 is main thrust of historic @People4Dharma letter
Image
While Kerala HC in its 1991 judgement followed the above principle scrupulously by acknowledging the protection of will of Deity u Art 26 the SC in Sept 2018 judgement did not follow this & violated basic structure & bar u Art 363 due to Kingdom donation
thehindu.com/news/national/…
When SC alters basic structure through interpretation and does not respect bar u Art 363 impacting fundamental rights of Hindu Deities arising out of Kingdom donation of Shri Marthanda Varma devotees have fundamental right to approach His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn to rectify it
Normally the Supreme Court is approached to protect fundamental rights u Art 32 this is probably first time that His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn is approached u Art 60 as defender of our Constitution rep of Nation's Dharma after SC rejected Deity petition.
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rangarajan chilkur

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @csranga

2 Dec
The @People4Dharma historic letter explains the basis of Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement July 18th letter conveyed by His Koorma form appearing in Shivalayam of temple to His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn to follow Dharma for protection of Dharma
ImageImageImage
Since Chilkur Balaji Temple follows Sri Ahobila Matha sampradaya path to restore back protection of Dharma by having Hon'ble PM @narendramodi ji fulfill his April 18th 2019 promise to Hindu Deities which secured victory is explained in letter to His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn ImageImageImage
As His excellency @rashtrapatibhvn has been approached u Art 60 to provide suitable dharmik advice to council of ministers headed by Hon'ble PM @narendramodi ji a devotee; His Excellency can consult Acharyas give advice to fulfill 👆promise👇notification.
ImageImage
Read 6 tweets
1 Dec
Appreciate quick action of AP Archaka Samakhya in ensuring dissolution of Trust Board action against people who were involved in attack on hereditary Archaka who was doing his duty w devotion to ensure free darshan for devotees as per sampradaya of temple we should not stop here.
AP Dharmika Parishad when it was operational had grievances cell for Archakas which had very eminent people including Dr MVS and acted as a check on such Endowments Dept officials and Trustboard members who have tendency to ill treat Archaka community members legacy of 30/87 Act.
AP Dharmika Parishad itself was born out of amendment to 30/87 Act through a grass root movement which was triggered by supreme sacrifice of Shir Bheemasena Chary on the bell of a temple due to harassment of the officials to bring to notice of society the draconian nature of Act. Image
Read 6 tweets
1 Dec
Late Nani Palkhivala warned that in the name of reform don't reform a religion out of existence. Covid experience has shown that Secular State in the name of reform should not reform protection of Dharma out of existence putting at risk welfare of Nation.

We could as a society have avoided lot of Covid pain if we had paid due attention to Voice of Dharma which asked us to rectify Sabarimala judgement denying Deity rights the reformation of protection of Dharma for our own welfare is gist of @People4Dharma
Image
Hope His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn will use his extraordinary powers that exist in Constitution to act as per Art 60 oath and put a full stop to this selective reformation experiment of secular state on Hindu religion which has put our welfare at risk.
Image
Read 4 tweets
1 Dec
The issue is loss of Art 26 rights for Hindu Religious denomination in legal personality of Deity which existed on 26th Jan 1950. We need to address this root cause else the secular state will make us go round the Courts forever for every temple property.
Pious purpose of the donor is protected in legal personality of Deity u Art 26 there cannot be any diversion as it is the fundamental right of denomination exercised through Deity. Let us make this clear to Secular State by supporting Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement Image
Let us reclaim right of Hindu Religious denomination in legal personality of Hindu Deities which existed on 26th Jan 1950 as per agreement with Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity arising out of kingdom donation by Shri Marthanda Varma please support👇
Image
Read 4 tweets
30 Nov
Interesting coincidence Shri Padmanabha Swamy Temple case is in the name of Shri Marthanda Varma vs Secular State..@People4Dharma which ensured victory of Dharma in this case is now using facts in judgement to protect pious purpose of Shri Marthanda Varma
Image
The @People4Dharma rep dharmik spirit that is still alive in Bharath which cannot accept fact that we merged Kingdom ruled by Deity & today interpret our Constitution in a way that Deity has ZERO rights, the judiciary may not follow Dharma but People of this great Nation follow Image
The historic letter of @People4Dharma to His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn rep of Nation's Dharma is a letter to restore the spirit of Constitutional Morality equated to Dharma by late Shri Nani Palkhivala that our ancestors followed for thousands of years.
Read 6 tweets
29 Nov
Dear @PawanKalyan garu our Constitution u Art 26 prevents diversion of properties as religious denomination has right to have property used for purposes for which it was dedicated. More than law support to reclaiming lost Art 26 rights will be beneficial
ImageImage
Dear @PawanKalyan garu we have lost Art 26 right of Hindu Religious denomination in legal personality of our Hindu Deities post Sabarimala judgement. Kindly support initiative to expedite MHA notification on Art 26 Hindu Deity rights which is still pending
Image
A Hindu Deity does not belong to any political party but parties can promise in the spirit of 'Mat Karma Paramo Bhava' and secure benefit as @BJP4India did win 2019 election.
Like Lord Shri Hanuman it is duty of every devotee to now remind about this promise till it is fulfilled Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!