1/n Food for thought:
An understanding of metabolic health and a species appropriate diet hasn't informed conversations about sustainable health care. The "downstream" effects of food choices are usually informed by the received wisdom of the official "healthy diet."
What if:
2/n So what if, just speculating wildly here, what if there was a way for people with T2D to stop using those medications? I know, that sounds like crazy-talk, but hear me out.
Big numbers and unfamiliar units are sometimes hard to visualize, so here's one equivalent:
3/n And another (I'll add more).
Remember:
- These figures are *just* for the diabetes pharmaceuticals
- These figures do not include medications for related metabolic diseases.
Please note: These are preliminary figures. I've asked folks to check my work.
4/n In the US, Transportation & Electricity each account for 28% of Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas emissions. All of agriculture = 9% (with animal ag being 4% of total, beef being ~2% of total).
5/n To be clear, this isn't about denying anyone essential medications, nor should it suggest that every person with Type 2 Diabetes could eliminate all their medications.
The point is that there's good news. Individuals can improve their health AND lower their emissions.
6/n The potential here is significant and it needs to be recognized.
7/n Everyone who can should pursue improvements in their energy efficiency. (But pleases remember that ~45% of humanity consumes less than 1,000 Kw/hr of electricity per year.)
8/n *If* it's possible to restore your metabolic health through effective lifestyle intervention (including a species appropriate diet) AND reduce your "footprint," isn't that good news? Shouldn't more folks be aware of it?
9/n And how might that shift the conversation about renewable industries?
10/n Please believe this.
You *can.*
You're worth it.
Showing work (a for conservative estimate):
US pop = 331,002,651 per bit.ly/3oedYh4
9.4% diabetic, 90% of those T2D per bit.ly/3o4ziWm
80% of diabetics taking medication per bit.ly/3qizSBJ
2 metric ton CO2e / person w/ T2D per bit.ly/2lAyuO5
13/n A few more, for review, in case it comes up...
Always look for the actual numbers, not those that have been popularized...
14/n Try to compare the actual numbers to those of other activities...
15/n Do not accept GLOBAL values as representing individual countries.
Also, recognize what the trends are in different countries/regions.
16/n People have estimated the potential benefit of eliminating livestock agriculture (note that the animals don't get to hang around...).
No one can objectively say that the potential benefits outweigh the potential costs. pnas.org/content/pnas/e…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Real World vs biophobic #TechnoUtopianists.
1a
"Livestock are critical for sustainable development yet often overlooked. The world’s cows, sheep, goats, pigs, poultry and other farm animals are the mainstay of livelihoods across the developing world. ... "
1b
"... And the energy and nutrient-dense milk, meat and eggs these animals produce provide hundreds of millions of families in the world’s poorer countries with basic livelihoods, incomes, food and nutrition." whylivestockmatter.org
2a
"Globally, livestock contribute about 40% of agricultural GDP and provide livelihoods and incomes for at least 1.3 billion people worldwide. ... " whylivestockmatter.org/economic-oppor…
1/5
Food for Thought (especially for the rural #Ruminati):
“Diabetes prevalence is about 15 to 17 percent higher in rural areas than in urban areas..."
2/5
"in rural areas, the likelihood of dying due to diabetes-related hospitalizations was 3.4 percent higher in rural areas than in large central metropolitan areas..."
3/5
"Mortality rates were highest within the rural areas of the South and Midwest regions (21.0 and 15.1 deaths per 100,000 population, respectively)... "
1/4 Thought for our time:
"Experts should be on tap, not on top."
@fleroy1974 tweeted this '02 paper "The arrogance of preventive medicine" cmaj.ca/content/167/4/…. While it's focus is the hormone replacement therapy debacle, *perhaps* we can add a few others to the list 🤔😏🤠
2/4 "I place the blame directly on the medical “experts” who, to gain private profit (from their industry affiliations), to satisfy a narcissistic need for public acclaim or in a misguided attempt to do good, advocate “preventive” manoeuvres that have never been validated...
3/ ... in rigorous randomized trials. Not only do they abuse their positions by advocating unproven “preventives,” they also stifle dissent. Others, who should know better than to promote “preventive” manoeuvres without clinical trials evidence, are simply wrongheaded."
1. More thoughts on protein in human nutrition. Remember that cereals supply a greater proportion of crude protein in humanity's diet than all animal source foods (ASF), combined.
2. Wheat provides almost half of that portion, a greater amount than any single ASF!
3. But the quality of that protein is poor, especially for children...