"Racism is both overt and covert. It takes two, closely related forms: individual whites acting against individual blacks, and acts by the total white community against the black community. 1/
2/ "We call these individual racism and institutional racism. The first consists of overt acts by individuals, which cause death, injury or the violent destruction of property. This type can be recorded by television cameras; it can frequently be observed in the process of
3/ "commission. The second type is less overt, far more subtle, less identifiable in terms of specific individuals committing the acts. But it is no less destructive of human life. The second type originates in the operation of established and respected forces in the society,
4/ "and thus receives far less public condemnation than the first type.
"When white terrorists bomb a black church and kill five black children, that is an act of individual racism, widely deplored by most segments of the society.
5/ "But when in that same city—Birmingham, Alabama—five hundred black babies die each year because of the lack of proper food, shelter and medical facilities, and thousands more are destroyed and maimed physically, emotionally and intellectually because of conditions of poverty
6/ "and discrimination in the black community, that is a function of institutional racism. When a black family moves into a home in a white neighborhood and is stoned, burned or routed out, they are victims of an overt act of individual racism which many people will condemn—at
7/ "least in words. But it is institutional racism that keeps black people locked in dilapidated slum tenements, subject to the daily prey of exploitative slumlords, merchants, loan sharks and discriminatory real estate agents." (Black Power, pp. 3-4)
8/8 For more on the traditional discourse (no, not the CRT discourse), see:
In my opinion, I think it is important to recognize that there are a few different groups (I’ll suggest 4) of people at odds in this whole Critical Race Theory (CRT) debate in the Church.
This is a long thread, I apologize, but I truly think we need to make these distinctions:
2/ The 1st group are just your run of the mill racists. You know the crowd. They are loud and all over the internet.
3/ They believe that slavery and Jim Crow are ancient history, the racists were the KKK types who are now hard to find, the sexual revolution and Great Society—even the CRM itself—destroyed the Black family and led to degenerate behaviors that explain the VAST racial disparity
Given that social, legal, and economic systems do not just sprout from the ground naturally like plants, but are human created historical and contingent artifacts, then we must necessarily offer moral justifications for the way things are. 1/
2/ Now, given that our own system has produced/allowed for/maintained VAST and ever increasing inequalities—some with hundreds of billions and MANY MANY more completely broke—we either need to show the moral justification for our chosen system or change it.
3/ A very common justification (NOT THE ONLY POSSIBLE) is that our system simply rewards the smartest and hardest working individuals, therefore huge disparities in income and wealth are fully justified as they reflect individual merit.
Was rereading a section of Kendi's How to be an Antiracist and was reminded of this section on personal responsibility:
"Indeed, I was irresponsible in high school. It makes antiracist sense to talk about the personal irresponsibility of individuals like me of all races. 1/
2/ "I screwed up. I could have studied harder. But some of my White friends could have studied harder, too, and their failures and irresponsibility didn’t somehow tarnish their race.
3/ "… How do we think about my young self, the C or D student, in antiracist terms? The truth is that I should be critiqued as a student—I was undermotivated and distracted and undisciplined. In other words, a bad student. But I shouldn’t be critiqued as a bad Black student.
If COLLEGE EDUCATED MARRIED White women have anywhere from 2 to 12 times the wealth (depending on age) of COLLEGE EDUCATED MARRIED Black women, tell me what supposed "race culture" traits account for that persistent delta? Is it the music? The food? C'moooon, get off it already.
There is SO much wrong with the stupid "it's the culture!" argument that I can only believe it persists because it's the current legacy of the "inferiority due to climate" type arguments of the past. They didn't think that was racist then either. Bleh.
And upon ANY level of inspection, it becomes immediately clear that they really just mean that supposedly race-wide inferior BEHAVIORS are to blame; "culture" is just the wave of the hand word to make it all seem sociologically grounded. But it's not. It's BS.
Brother, when you say such things as in the attached image, you show your hand. It is clear you haven't yet even been persuaded by MLK's original message, nor the Civil Rights Movement itself.
For example, Dr. King wrote,
"Our hope for creative living in this world house 1/
2/ "that we have inherited lies in our ability to reestablish the moral ends of our lives in personal character and social justice."
Or how about,
"Social justice and progress are the absolute guarantors of riot prevention. There is no other answer. Constructive social change
3/ "will bring certain tranquillity; evasions will merely encourage turmoil. Negroes hold only one key to the double lock of peaceful change. The other is in the hands of the white community."
Or,
"We must recognize that we can’t solve our problem now until there is a radical
@D_B_Harrison Along with Critical Race Theorists, I believe race is a biological fiction and a social construction. But you are Biblically incorrect about genos/ethnos, entirely incorrect in fact.
Genos comes from the word ginomai, denoting birth or origin, and thus has to do with 1/
@D_B_Harrison 2/ solidarity of people groups by common progeneration. As an example, we read of Pharaoh in Stephen’s speech that,
"He dealt shrewdly with our race (genos) and forced our fathers to expose their infants, so that they would not be kept alive." (Acts 7:19)
This word is commonly
@D_B_Harrison 3/ used in the New Testament when referring to the Jews or Hebrews as common “race” of people. But we see the same applied to other people groups as well. E.g., Mark 7:26:
"Now the woman was a Gentile, a Syrophoenician by birth (genei). And she begged him to cast the demon out