But really bothers me is that people can't distinguish between "most secure" and "least fraud". These are orthogonal statements. It's like the most secure bank against armed robbers, with thick steel vaults, is not secure against embezzlement.
https://twitter.com/Timodc/status/1333548404123660290
The statement is a vague response to vague accusations. I mean, that's entirely appropriate. If you vaguely say "something must've happened", then it's good to make clear "probably not".
That's all that we have right now -- vague innuendo from the Trump camp, with nothing substantive.
Now, if Trump were to find some concrete evidence, then this claim would be insufficient.
Now, if Trump were to find some concrete evidence, then this claim would be insufficient.
I'm sure we all (well, most of this) are going to be adult about this, if ever substantive evidence comes to light, but I wanted to point this out: we aren't saying that no evidence of computer problems can be found, only that's so far it's just conspiracy theory evidence.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
