A short thread about cultural resentment. I am old enough to remember when rural and small-town people were considered virtuous upright upright, and city dwellers were considered diseased bags of walking sin. /1
There was a reason for this: the cities were a collapsing mess, and “real America“ judged the people who lived in them. Especially if they were black or some other shade of non-white, but also plenty of hate for the white pinko elites. /2
Ted Cruz talking about “New York values“ was an attempt to do that kind of nostalgic throwback. But everyone was in on it. Even Billy Joel sang songs about the dead future of sinking Manhattan out at sea. /3
In New York, corporations advertised that they were leaving the city and that not being located in New York made them a better place to work. On billboards. In New York. /4
People forget that movies like “the Warriors “ and “Escape from New York” were a pretty standard cultural depiction of a big city like New York. I could name others. (Robocop.) City dwellers took it on the chin. /5
But Donald Trump loses an election and Real America loses its shit, talking about how much everybody hates them and how no one respects them and how we all have to sit around in diners asking them why they hate everyone else so much./6
So here’s an idea. No place is perfect. Few of us live exactly where we want to be. If you like where you live, great. If you don’t, that can’t be helped. But endless comparisons to rich people in penthouses is stupid. /7
Small-town America once didn’t give a shit about the cities. Understandably. Maybe it would be good if they went back to that and focused on the things that happen around them, instead of things that happen clear across the country. /8
Someplace in America is always on the upswing and someplace is always on the decline. In 1975 the cities were on the rocks. Today it’s the small towns. That is not a massive failure of government, no matter what pandering right wingers try to tell us. /9x
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@dcherring@CaseyNikoloric What I'm telling you is that we *know*. It's not that complicated. And that minority of people better get their asses in gear and start learning about what makes *the rest of us* tick.
@dcherring@CaseyNikoloric Dennis, when you say "it behooves to be deeper in our understanding," you say this as if the Trump cult is some unique tribe that requires our compassion and understanding, and not exactly what they are telling us they are. /1
@dcherring@CaseyNikoloric But more to the point, why is it always a plea for *us* to understand *them*? Why is it always one way? Why is there never a plea - or demand - to people in rural Indiana to say: "Listen, you better start understanding the 100 million Americans who aren't like you."
@dcherring@CaseyNikoloric Way, way too many of them. Right-populism and the nationalist streak that goes with it is cruel and other-directed, not just in the United States, but the UK, Italy, Poland, Hungary, many other places. /1
@dcherring@CaseyNikoloric In Poland, for example, anti-Muslim feeling is running super-high. But the punch line? There are almost no Muslims in Poland. It's a scapegoating of other people for things Poles worry about. As @AdamSerwer once said of Trumpism: The cruelty is the point. /2
@dcherring@CaseyNikoloric@AdamSerwer Read the new book by @anneapplebaum about democracy being on the ropes. It's not about honest, hard-working people fearing for their way of life. It's a nasty virus that is spreading in places where life isn't really all that bad. /3
Now, why am I taking all these images about JFK and recasting them in 2020 terms? It's not because I have any love for JFK, as @bobcesca_go can tell you. Rather, it is to make the point that the terms we use about "forgotten towns" in 2020 are ridiculous. /1
We have taken the great populist yawps of the past ten years and recast them as legitimate gripes from The Oppressed and Forgotten, when in fact this kind of malignant, backwards thinking has always been around; books were written on back in the day that we now ignore. /2
Now, as then, we conveniently forget that the *truly* The Oppressed and Forgotten are not part of those movements at all. Most Trumpers (and Lega, and Brexit voters) are middle class. Yes, Appalachia loves Trump. But that's not how populism has grown. That's not who they are. /3
To provide some context: I have no idea why Trump's guys flew some bombers over the Middle East earlier today. But the mission is over, and "deter aggression and reassure U.S. partners and allies" is what U.S. administrations do when they don't really have anything else. /1
This is mostly a Cold War hangover, where "sending up some nuclear-armed bombers" had actual meaning. Since the B-52 is no longer part of the nuclear bombing mission, it's a showy way to say "We see you." It's not unique to Trump. But it does raise some questions. /2
Mostly, the question of who thought this was needed. I wouldn't be surprised if someone in DoD did this to placate President Angry Pants so that he could feel like he ordered something. Another question is whether something happened off the radar that the US didn't like. /3
So, here's a thread on missile defense, since the U.S. is trumpeting shooting down an ICBM from an AEGIS. This is about why I was okay with SDI in the 80s and think missile defense is now a gigantic waste of money and that "We have a defense!" announcements are a bad idea. /1
When I was working as a consultant on SDI stuff in the 80s, I recall two major assumptions: One is that it would freak the Soviets out. The other is that if it were ever built, it would be stationed above our ICBM fields as a point defense to complicate Soviet strike planning. /2
You can argue about whether "freaking the Soviets out" was a good idea. It almost backfired because it convinced at least some Soviet leaders that we were looking to start WWIII. But it did convince the Soviets that we were determined to win a qualitative competition. /3
For the people who think I only started to wrestle with this "experts in a democracy" problem just a few years ago, this is from a book review I wrote thirty years ago - and it uses a line that appeared decades later in the book. /1
I was brutal on the authors of a book on SDI because they basically said that things like strategic defenses were just too important to be left to presidents like Reagan, and that engineers should get the final word. That made me bristle, and still does. /2
That's why "Death of Expertise" had a chapter explaining the difference between experts and policymakers - basically arguing that people in a democracy have the right to insist on dumb policies - even if I wish they wouldn't. That's still how I feel. /3