This week's ONS weekly deaths report again shows deaths well above normal in the week to November 20th.
All causes deaths were 21% above the five year average, meaning 2,169 extra deaths.
And still well outside the normal range (showing by the dotted lines on the graph below).
Excess deaths are also still tracking the same curve as all measures of covid-19 deaths.
And as usual, most death certificates mentioning covid-19 listed it as the underlying cause of death (ie, they died "from" it not "with" it).
87.5% in the latest week.
Meanwhile deaths involving flu and pneumonia (which are mostly pneumonia) remain above normal for the time of year, just like in the first wave.
This is expected because people who died from covid-19 may also have pneumonia listed on their death certificate as being involved.
As usual though, the vast majority of deaths involving flu and pneumonia don't list that as the underlying cause of death. Whereas the vast majority of covid deaths do list it as the underlying cause.
So deaths "due to" covid are far higher than deaths "due to" flu & pneumonia.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This week's Test & Trace report shows cases falling sharply in the week to November 25th, thanks to lockdown 2.0.
There's also a sudden big improvement in contact tracing performance (which turns out to be smoke and mirrors), and some odd revisions to old pillar 1 testing data.
Cases in England were falling sharply towards the end of November, with both the number and percentage of people testing positive falling by about a quarter compared to the previous week.
There's a small drop in the number of tests done, but it may well be due to reduced demand.
In case there's any doubt about the effectiveness of lockdowns, regional data shows clearly that all areas where cases were level or still rising when lockdown 2.0 began started falling in perfect unison about a week later.
The question now is whether that can be sustained.
The government has now released some info on how LFTs compared to PCR in field tests in Liverpool. h/t @ScienceShared
It's not great.
LFTs found about half the people that tested positive with PCR. Which is a little better than my back of the envelope estimate.
But...
It only found "more than" 70% of people "with higher viral loads, who are likely to be the most infectious".
Far less than the 95% it managed in the original Porton Down trial, which was in a lab using spiked samples, not members of the public shoving swabs up their noses.
So although the LFTs have found a few hundred cases that would have been missed otherwise, they still missed half the people with the virus that were tested.
Including 20-30% of the ones most likely to be infectious.
The latest ONS report shows another rise in excess deaths in the week to November 13th.
All causes deaths were 18% above the five year average, meaning 1,917 extra deaths.
Still far above the highest number of deaths we've seen in any of the last five years.
And excess deaths are still following almost exactly the same curve as all measures of covid-19 deaths (due to, involving, and within 28 days of a test).
This is not a coincidence.
As usual, the vast majority of death certificates in that week which mentioned covid-19 had it listed as the underlying cause of death - 88%.
In other words, people are mostly dying "from" covid-19, not "with" it.
Shocking scenes at Randox's lab in last week's @C4Dispatches report.
Staff crammed together on 12 hour shifts, huge stacks of boxes waiting to be unpacked, delays processing tests, samples accidentally thrown away, faulty tubes leaking, sealed tubes jumbled together in boxes...
And yet despite these failings there don't seem to be significant numbers of false positives.
The same lab handles tests from Premiership Rugby. In late August / early September, when they were running over capacity, their positivity rate was under 0.1%.
The @DailyMailUK and @RossjournoClark have published another article downplaying the second wave, which got a government health warning from @DHSCgovuk, who said it was "misleading".
1) They claim half of all hospitals don't have any covid-19 patients.
That's because they counted mental health units, cosmetic surgeries, community health centres and specialist units like Moorfields Eye Hospital. These would NEVER treat covid patients.
Lest we forget, Patel is no stranger to breaching ministerial standards, after she was caught having secret meetings with the Israeli government while supposedly on holiday, and was forced to resign from her job as International Development Secretary.
And now the senior civil servant whose departure from the Home Office sparked the investigation has weighed in, saying that, contrary to Patel's claims that she didn't know she was upsetting people, he'd talked to her repeatedly about her behaviour.