In May of 2019, Sen. Ron Ryden (D-OR) and 14 Senate Democrats proposed a bill that would have mandated hand-marked paper ballots, automatic election audits and new cybersecurity standards for every state.
I'm not kidding. The bill literally tried to formalize into law all the things the Trump campaign is now PAYING FOR and GOING TO COURT OVER. And McConnell didn't bring it to a vote because he was scared of Trump's reaction.
The bill had $500 million for new secure ballot-scanning machines and would have reimbursed states for conducting post-election audits. But Republicans refused it because the justification was foreign interference and not voter fraud.
Fortunately, 95% of all ballots and every ballot in every swing state was still cast on paper. But nearly 2 years ago we could have been setting up the infrastructure for immediate post-election audits, and the only reason we aren't is because Republicans refused to play ball.
Don't care about your politics, don't care who you voted for, if you're pissed off or feel like you can't trust the outcome of this race — there are clear and obvious lines between the ppl who tried to fix it and the ones who didn't.
Sen. Ron Wyden* -- no Ryden. Duh
Democrats also tried to pass measures that would ban voting machines from the internet and prevent machines from being produced in foreign countries.
Resisting the urge to publish a vague, wide-ranging article accusing Donald Trump, Jenna Ellis and Rudy Giuliani of widespread election fraud that garnered 70 million+ votes and then demand they provide evidence to prove they're innocent
I mean, think about it. Donald Trump got 74 million votes, more than Ronald Reagan or Abe Lincoln! That seems statistically impossible
Did anyone notice that all of Donald Trump's votes came in on election day, when we were told most people were going to vote by mail???
1/ I've seen this video, and I have some thoughts. First -- I want to make it clear that the presumptions/narration here is doing far more work than the "evidence" of the actual footage. Just pause and think about it...
2/ Ballots being a suitcase or under a table don’t make them shady. Look at the room. It's chock full of votes. There were 5 million votes in Georgia. Were these ballots being rescanned? Cured? Were they even absentee ballots? Were they even ballots at all? You can't even tell.
3/ None of this is clear from a brief one minute clip. But even if you take the narrator at their word (which is given Trump lawyers & OAN a lot of credit, based on their history so far) there's still nothing here that's clearly nefarious...
The people following Sidney Powell and Lin Wood around who believe this stuff are not attached to reality. It's the closest thing to a cult in politics that I've ever seen -- and it's not remotely close. They're actually brainwashed. And I don't think it can be undone.
I have no idea how to break the spell. I've made some inroads with certain folks privately but not enough for them to give up (yet) and see the real world. Journalists and pundits will dance around it but it's just true.
It's a political cult.
There's a great rule in life: everyone gets one conspiracy. Mine is the govt is covering up proof of alien life. Yours can be whatever you want.
These people have dozens. Dominion. JFK. QAnon. Obamagate. Pizzagate. Seth Rich.
Hilarious update from me: Scott Adams has now blocked me on Twitter. This was after I repeatedly asked him to provide evidence for his conspiracy theories of election fraud, and then promised to follow-up when he kept telling me the proof was coming soon.
I'm at the "taking no bullshit" part of this exercise. If someone is still on board with "the election was stolen!" stuff after what we've seen in court & what election officials have said for 2 weeks, they're bad actors. They don't deserve to be taken seriously. Full stop.
What Pat Toomey, Brad Raffensperger, Fred Upton, WSJ editorial board, National Review, etc. are doing is not hard. Trump-friendly conservatives saying the obvious: there's no evidence, this is dangerous, it's over.
Others doing the opposite have no excuse. Total hacks.
And again, when SCOTUSblog says there's zero chance any of this comes to the Supreme Court, that's not partisan. They're not "leaning" or "being biased" all of the sudden. It's the same outlet it's always been. They're just telling you reality. It's time for everyone to wake up.