Does Mayor de Blasio, who won election on a promise to end the “tale of two cities,” want to weaken or entrench racial segregation in New York City? (1/9) @Sifill_LDF@ItsLisaRice
We ask because, based on the way his administration has waged a four-year-long court battle defending a housing policy that deepens divisions, he seems to have a thing for ethnic balkanization. (2/9)
Reams of data show how in America, geography can determine destiny. In New York, residential clustering of people by race leads to clustering in education and can yield worse economic and health outcomes. (3/9)
Yet the de Blasio administration goes to the mattresses to defend “community preference,” a city housing practice that allots up to 50% of units in newly built affordable housing developments to current neighborhood residents. (4/9)
De Blasio’s administration maintains the preference is critical to securing local officials’ and neighborhood groups’ approval for developments they’d otherwise oppose. But if City Hall thought this policy was so great,
why fight for two years in federal court to keep secret an analysis thoroughly demonstrating how it actually creates “a sorting process that would not otherwise exist and does so in a pattern that causes material disparities by race and ethnicity”? (6/9)
That analysis, commissioned by the civil rights group that filed the lawsuit, also found that community preference so privileges local residents near new developments that it effectively keeps poor New Yorkers stuck wherever they already are,
even as most housing lottery applicants apply “at least 75% of the time” outside their own community district.
What New York City needs is a less myopic affordable housing policy,
one that builds the case for creating drastically more housing, affordable and market rate, citywide, instead of pitting neighborhoods and the people living in them against each other in a cage match for a vanishingly scarce supply. (9/9)
Some history on GOP’s deep commitment to election security. “Senate GOP Coronavirus Package Omits Additional Elections Funding;
House Democrats in May proposed sending $3.6 billion to state & local officials to help them hold elections during the pandemic.”
Senate Republicans didn’t include any new funding to help states and local governments to administer elections in their latest coronavirus aid package, setting up a fight over the issue in coming negotiations with Democrats.
House Democrats in May proposed sending $3.6 billion to state and local officials to help them hold elections during the pandemic, which has prompted many areas to expand vote-by-mail options and invest in protective equipment for poll workers.
A little history lesson. 42 USC 1985 prohibits civil rights conspiracies and is derived from Section 6 of the Civil Rights Act of 1870 and Section 2 of the Enforcement Act of 1871.
Section 3 is particularly timely.
Text follows in thread.
(3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges. If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons
of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory
A recently-announced de Blasio administration proposal to rezone SoHo and NoHo for new housing was
billed as a step to advance residential integration in the largely white, high-income area.
But a city policy that gives preference to local residents for new affordable housing units will likely limit the
fair housing potential of the rezoning.
...as the city now looks towards SoHo and NoHo, and
moves toward rezoning the majority-white Gowanus section of Brooklyn, the local set-aside brings up
thornier questions about retaining a neighborhood’s existing make-up.