Telegraph columnist Allison Pearson claimed that, last week, Sir Patrick Vallance and Chris Whitty presented cherry-picked figures from hospitals on course to run out of beds, despite falling or stable numbers of Covid patients in hospital.

The problem? They didn’t.

[Thread]👇
At the daily briefing on 26 November Sir Patrick and Professor Whitty made no mention of bed capacity at individual hospital trusts.

Sir Patrick noted that, at a national level, the number of Covid-19 patients in hospitals had “flattened.” [2/6]
At no point during the last week have we found any mention from the two advisors of bed occupancy problems in specific hospitals. [3/6]
Now, back on 31 October, the slides at the daily briefing did show figures from individual hospitals specifically affected by rising Covid-19 cases.

This may have been what Ms Pearson was referring to. [4/6]
But the situation on 31 October was very different to that on 26 November.

On 31 October, the rising number of beds occupied by patients with Covid in various hospitals, reflected the fact that Covid hospitalisations were rising across the country, as their slides showed. [5/6]
But, by 26 November, the number of people in hospital had flattened.

So what appears to have happened is, in an attempt to highlight cherry-picking, the Telegraph has cherry-picked data. [6/6]

Our fact check in full 👇
fullfact.org/health/pearson…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Full Fact

Full Fact Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FullFact

1 Oct 19
On @bbcr4today this morning, Boris Johnson claimed that a Brexit extension would cost £1bn a month. This is not true.

[1/4]
You can say your plan is to leave with a deal, or you can say an extension will cost £1 billion a month, but you can't say both.

When Mr Johnson repeats this claim, journalists should ask him if that means he’s not serious about getting a deal.

[2/4]
The UK has already agreed a deal with the EU that includes payments through to the end of 2020. An extension won’t change those payments.

[3/4]
Read 5 tweets
13 Sep 19
A Conservative Party Facebook ad seems to have altered the headline of a BBC News article so that it claims there will be a "£14 billion pound cash boost for schools".
fullfact.org/news/conservat…
[1/4]
The ads make it appear that the BBC endorsed the £14bn figure, when in fact they criticised it. The BBC told us that the headline on the article has never changed and so has never referred to the £14 bn.
[2/4]
It’s inappropriate for political parties, or any public body, to misrepresent the work of independent journalists in this way.
[3/4]
Read 4 tweets
12 Sep 19
A viral piece about the link between hedge funds, the Vote Leave campaign and Boris Johnson's leadership bid claims there was a large spike in "shorting" in the lead up to Boris Johnson becoming Conservative leader.

We can't find any such spike.

fullfact.org/economy/short-…

[1/5]
We think Byline Times looked only at the number of active short positions, not all of them.

Shorting is where a fund borrows shares, sells them and hopes the share price falls so they can buy them back at a lower price, return them to the lender, and make a profit.

[2/5]
Because short positions are typically only active for a short period of time, you'd expect the positions active at any given time to be clustered in the recent past.

[3/5]
Read 5 tweets
25 Jun 19
You may have seen that £2.4 million from the Sovereign Grant was used to pay for renovations of Frogmore Cottage, the home of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

This is how royal finances work (a thread) 👑

fullfact.org/economy/royal-…

[1/7]
The Queen receives three forms of income.

One is income from her private investments. These investments are owned by the Queen personally.

For example the Queen owns the Royal Stud at Sandringham which makes money which she pays tax on.

[2/7]
The second is income from the Duchy of Lancaster. The Duchy contains land, property and assets which make money from things like rent. The portfolio is held in trust and passed from Sovereign to Sovereign (so the Queen can't just decide to sell it all).

[3/7]
Read 7 tweets
18 Feb 19
An election called tomorrow would be wide open to abuse—so we welcome the DCMS committee's calls for an overhaul of election and political advertising rules to make them fit for the digital age.

But the govt mustn't be allowed to water them down.

publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cm… [1/5]
We need a public database of online political adverts, provided in real time, with full information on content, targeting, reach and spend.

The government should commit today to making these changes before the next election and start putting a timetable in place. [2/5]
The creation of a Code of Ethics needs to be an open, transparent process that involves the public—not just tech companies and government. People need to be involved in these decisions. [3/5]
Read 5 tweets
11 Oct 18
The problem with the Department for Education's misleading claims — in one thread 📚
The Department for Education (DfE) recently made several claims about education spending which are technically correct, but misleading. Here's why...
[1/5]
DfE said...
1: Funding for schools will be at a record level by 2020.
But this doesn't factor in inflation, or spend per pupil. Spending per pupil in England fell by 8% in real terms from 2009/10 to 2017/18, and will be held constant from 2017/18 to 2019/20. [2/5]
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!