El quinto informe anual ¿Quem Defende Seus Dados? de @InternetLabbr identifica las medidas que las telcos deben tomar para proteger la privacidad y la protección de datos en Brasil. /1 eff.org/es/deeplinks/2…
El informe publicado por @InternetLabbr evalúa a las telcos en políticas de protección de datos, pautas de aplicación de la ley, defensa de usuarios en cortes y debates políticos y notificación a los usuarios. /2 quemdefendeseusdados.org.br/en/
En claro contraste con la versión 2016 del informe de @InternetLabbr, la mitad de las telcos (Claro, NET, TIM y Algar) mejoran en la protección de datos esté 2020, impulsados principalmente por la nueva ley de protección de datos de Brasil. /3 eff.org/es/deeplinks/2…
Esta edición de ¿Quem Defende Seus Dados? de @InternetLabbr, coloca TIM a la cabeza, seguido de Vivo y Oí detrás. Nextel quedó en el último lugar igual que en 2019, lejos del resto de sus competidores. /4 eff.org/es/deeplinks/2…
El informe de @InternetLabbr evaluó qué empresas se destacaron en la defensa pública de la privacidad frente a la enorme presión gubernamental para acceder a los datos de telecomunicaciones durante la pandemia de COVID-19. /5 eff.org/es/deeplinks/2…
Según el nuevo informe de @InternetLabbr la mayoría de las telcos brasileñas siguen demorando en notificar a sus usuarios cuando el gobierno exige sus datos. Esta notificación previa es esencial para restringir los pedidos de datos por parte del gobierno. eff.org/es/deeplinks/2…
Además, por primera vez, el informe Quem Defende Seus Dados? de @InternetLabbr evalúa si las telcos brasileñas publican su propia evaluación del impacto de la protección de datos; lamentablemente, ninguna lo hizo. /7 eff.org/es/deeplinks/2…
Ante la polémica sobre la interpretación de las leyes que obligan a las empresas a revelar datos al gobierno brasileño, el informe de este año de @InternetLabbr analiza la transparencia de las empresas en cuanto a su interpretación legal de dichas leyes./8 eff.org/es/deeplinks/2…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
EFF has published a new report—"Surveillance Compounded: Real-Time Crime Centers in the U.S."—which reveals how local law enforcement in more than 80 regions have created high-tech hubs to monitor communities.
In Sacramento, CA you might notice little metal boxes marked "POLICE" attached to traffic lights. Those are called "Police Observation Devices" or PODs, and they contain cameras that feed into the Sacramento Police Department's Real-Time Crime Center 2/ atlasofsurveillance.org/real-time-crim…
The Atlanta Loudermilk Video Integration Center is a real-time crime center with access to more than 12,800 cameras, including cameras operated by private businesses. 3/ atlasofsurveillance.org/real-time-crim…
.@InternetLabbr’s fifth annual Quem Defende Seus Dados? report identifies steps companies should take to protect Brazil’s telecom privacy and data protection. /1 eff.org/deeplinks/2020…
This year's @InternetLabbr’s report evaluates providers in their data protection policies, law enforcement guidelines, defending users in the judiciary and in policy debates, data protection impact assessment, and user notification. /2 quemdefendeseusdados.org.br/en/
In stark contrast to @InternetLabbr’s 2016 report, this year half of the telecom providers (Claro, NET, TIM, and Algar) have made significant progress in data protection, a shift primarily fueled by Brazil’s new data protection law. /3 eff.org/deeplinks/2020…
Want a crash course in how to identify surveillance technologies at protests?
Watch our *new video* and learn:
✔️Where to look for these technologies
✔️How they look
✔️How they function
✔️How they are used by police
✔️What kind of data they collect
We've also updated our previous blog post on this topic, which includes pictures and explanations of common, often secretive, surveillance tech: eff.org/deeplinks/2020…
We thank @SPARC_NA for its tireless fight for a more equitable and free system for academic publishing. In support of #OAWeek2020, this thread highlights just some of the ways unrestrained innovation can make for a better tomorrow.
Earlier this year, publishers made relevant COVID-19 research accessible. While we applaud this, it’s not enough. We need to remove barriers that keep government-funded research from benefiting everyone in the first place, not just in a pandemic. eff.org/deeplinks/2020…
Universities have been forced online, and now have the choice of two futures. Let traditional publishing keep textbook prices prohibitively high, or support Open Education Resources for a more equitable future. eff.org/deeplinks/2020…
DHS is trying to push through a new rule that would require over 6 million immigrants & U.S. citizens annually to surrender their biometric information— including DNA, face scans, and behaviorial biometrics—when seeking any immigration benefit. federalregister.gov/documents/2020…
The proposed rule is part of what @EricLiptonNYT describes as the Trump administration’s attempt “to enact regulatory changes affecting millions of Americans in a blitz.” nytimes.com/2020/10/16/us/…