1/ Ok since you asked, here are my reactions to the Slack deal and @levie comments to the effect that “the idea that workers would someday choose all their own tools was always a fantasy... Best product doesn’t always win, you also need the biggest sales force.” My thoughts:
2/ Bottom-up is still the best way into enterprises for startups. If Slack had to sell top-down, they wouldn’t have gotten anywhere. Especially true for products whose advantage is usability, rather than checkboxes. “Show, not tell”. Proof of the pudding is in the eating of it.
3/ Bottom-up works best for new categories of software. Once IT makes a wall-to-wall decision, it settles the matter. In other words, bottom-up works best when there’s no top-down. Nature abhors a vacuum. In this case, an IT vacuum gets filed by “shadow IT.”
4/ Thus it’s incumbent on the startup to quickly convert bottom-up traction into deals. Bottom-up is great for top-of-funnel but you still need a sales team to close. Enterprises don’t self-serve. This was a central learning of Yammer.

wsj.com/articles/BL-VC…
5/ Slack eventually got this right but the initial anti-sales mentality did cost them some time. Let’s put this in context: they had ~7 years of otherwise flawless execution. But still, the sooner that product-first SaaS founders embrace sales, the better off they will be.
6/ In addition to sales, a bottom-up SaaS startup has to get earned marketing right. Use your early logos to consolidate the perception of category leadership before incumbents can react. “The one who defines the category wins the category.”

sacks.substack.com/p/the-one-who-…
7/ Just because Microsoft is a tough competitor, let’s not act like Slack “lost”. Slack did a phenomenal job, created a massive outcome and would have been fine on its own. It was also up against the toughest bundle there is. Being part of Salesforce bundle does help level that.
8/ Also note that Microsoft is not a latecomer to this party. They bought Yammer in 2012, ~2 years before Slack, in an effort to transition the Office franchise to cloud/social/mobile—an effort that eventually resulted in Teams. They were always going to be a tough competitor.
9/ This is a brilliant acquisition for Salesforce, not just because it gives them a new cloud and an application hub, but because it gives them a way onto every seat in the enterprise. Slack justifies a true wall-to-wall license. This has been Benioff’s dream since Chatter.
10/ Expect more acquisitions to fill out this new “communications cloud” or however Salesforce defines it. //

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Sacks

David Sacks Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DavidSacks

1 Dec
1/ Let’s say you're a SaaS founder who’s looking to build a sales team for the first time. How do you structure quotas & compensation for the initial sales reps and their manager? Oftentimes, the biggest hurdle in hiring the first rep is not knowing how to incentivize them.
2/ There are actually a number of simple math-based rules that you can use to set up a sales team.

First, the standard commission rate for SaaS products is 10%.

Second, in constructing an OTE for an AE, a 50/50 split between base and variable compensation is typical.
3/ Taken together, these standards generate a third rule: the typical quota will equal 10x base salary. I call this the Rule of 10. This generates the following pay scale for AEs: Image
Read 8 tweets
14 Apr
1/ How to survive a depression:

If demand for your business suddenly drops 30%, 50%, 80% overnight, what do you do?

Cut costs by a commensurate amount to stay solvent.

This is very sad and tough to do but the answer is clear.
2/ Who can’t cut the requisite amount? Those with big fixed obligations. Eg:
— debt service (highly levered businesses)
— fixed payrolls (union contracts; govt workers; tenured staff)
— big leases (real estate, planes, capital equipment)

Expect those entities to need bailouts.
3/ Startups should do OK because they don’t have big fixed obligations. They can cut if they have to. Assuming they have the state of mind to do that and haven’t saddled themselves with fancy offices, venture debt, etc.
Read 5 tweets
11 Apr
Buchanan writes that the entire Trump presidency hangs on decision to reopen the economy. Trump says it’s the biggest decision he’s ever had to make.

What do you do when you have to make an existential decision under conditions of enormous uncertainty?

Try to derisk it. 1/
2/ How do you do that? Make the choice less binary.

For example:
— define red / yellow / green zones as @balajis has suggested.
— red zones stay under SIP until exponentiality is controlled.
— yellow zones allow low-risk groups out but they have to wear masks. ...
3/ In yellow, high-risk populations stay under SIP. Super-spreader locations (bars, dine-in restaurants, movie theaters) stay closed.
— green zones can loosen further but have to enforce their borders to make it work.
— same-day test & trace is the precondition to everything.
Read 5 tweets
28 Oct 19
Some thoughts on the topic du jour in tech right now -- the sudden reappraisal of tech-enabled businesses based on gross margins/unit economics. Here's what founders need to know.

The Gross Margin Problem: Lessons for Tech-Enabled Startups link.medium.com/Q6FMwpLZ90
1/ How did we get here? The truth is that software startups never had to worry about gross margins until software started eating the world. Gross margins only became a concern once software blended with physical-world products to create new “tech-enabled” business models.
2/ Historically, pure software businesses had perfect gross margins. All the expense was in creating the first copy; subsequent copies were free. Realizing that he could sell cheap mass-market software and make it up in volume made Bill Gates the richest man in the world.
Read 21 tweets
20 Apr 19
Startup Software is the new Enterprise Software.

Startup Software = tools that make it easier to create and build new companies. Eg Stripe, Shopify, WeWork, Plaid, Intercom, Outreach, etc etc.

This is the sleeper category in B2B. /1
Why Startup Software? Startups are not just a better entry point to the market (simpler product requirements, quicker sales cycles), the startup economy is now sufficiently large and dynamic to turn startup tool providers into unicorns. /2
Plus, successful startup tools can always move upmarket over time. So Startup Software often becomes Enterprise Software (eg AWS, Slack, Zoom). /3
Read 7 tweets
8 Apr 18
I like the concept of product-market-fit but @lochhead has a point about category design:

Those who define the category usually win the category.

An example of this...
When we launched Yammer a decade ago, the official category was “Social Software in the Workplace”. That was the name of Gartner’s Magic Quadrant. IBM and Jive won every year. We would not have fared well.
Gartner had a long list of feature requirements (like blogs and wikis) that we didn’t have. So instead of fighting for inclusion like most startups did, we fought to stay out of it.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!