Listening to the Election Contest trial in #Arizona. Observations:
1.Attorneys are rather annoying. Especially some of their voices.
2.The attorneys for Maricopa County appear to want any “eyes on ballots” to be prevented at all costs. Why? 🤔 1/6
1.Attorneys are rather annoying. Especially some of their voices.
2.The attorneys for Maricopa County appear to want any “eyes on ballots” to be prevented at all costs. Why? 🤔 1/6
3.If there are questions about the election, why do we allow the people who RAN the questionable election to TELL us that they did everything right? Why don’t they have to SHOW us?
4.Why have paper ballot back ups if no one can look at them? 2/6
4.Why have paper ballot back ups if no one can look at them? 2/6
5.Who are the temporary (and permanent) employees of the county who sat on the multiple 2 person adjudication boards and duplication boards? When did they register in their political parties? Are they long time Republicans or Democrats or recent voter registrants? 3/6
Were the “two parties” represented by adjudication & duplication boards always one Republican and one Democrat? Or could they be others? Who can see the logs that tell us who served on these boards as paid employees of Maricopa County? Why have logs if no one can see them? 4/6
6.When ballots & memory cards were taken to & from vendors, who were the people accompanying them? Were they always a Repub and a Dem? Who can see that chain of custody logs?
7.What is the chain of custody for the back up servers? Who is able to take them off site?
5/6
7.What is the chain of custody for the back up servers? Who is able to take them off site?
5/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
