MrCasey Profile picture
3 Dec, 5 tweets, 1 min read
Fr. Ripperger on the vaccines:

“It’s an aborted fetal cell line, a part of the body belonging to a child which was robbed from him by murder. It is still part of his remains...it‘s his DNA, it’s his cell line, hence it must be buried. That’s the only way to fulfill justice …👇
“ ... the temporal distance [the number of years since the abortion] has no bearing...you’re using it NOW. It’s an ongoing theft in relationship to this kid ...👇
“It still belongs to him [the aborted fetus]. It's his DNA. You stole it from him. This is how you got it & the fact that you've replicated it doesn't change the quality of the thing. That new cell which came from him, which ultimately belongs to him, still carries that quality."
Note: they are in the process of developing and testing vaccines that do not use the DNA/cell lines from aborted fetuses. All of the above is addressing only those that do.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with MrCasey

MrCasey Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MrCasey62

21 Dec
Abortion-connected vaccines do not suddenly become moral simply because some bishops oversimplify the Moral Theology down to “remote material cooperation“. And anyone describing those who see the immorality as “irresponsible”, in “dissent”, schismatic, or disobedient has no case.
Bp. Athanasius Schneider sees the immorality. Bp. Strickland sees it. No one is in any position to call them irresponsible, schismatic, or disobedient. And Fr. Ripperger has made clear why this cannot be passed off as mere “remote material cooperation“:

True Moral Theology states it violates the Principle of the Integral Good (in reference to Quid & the quality of the object of the exterior act, as well as Quibus Auxiliis). So, claiming it’s merely an issue of “remote material cooperation“ is insufficient. It’s too superficial.
Read 6 tweets
19 Feb
True story (thread):

I was an intern doing my surgery rotation. I’m walking down the hallway in the OR. All the OR room doors are closed except one . . .
There’s another intern leaning against that doorway, looking in. I ask him what’s going on. He says, “21-year-old kid. Motorcycle accident. Brain-dead. They’re harvesting his organs.” . . .
I look in and I see a surgeon standing over the kid’s open chest with a knife in his hand. I look at the heart monitor: normal rate and rhythm. I look at the oxygen saturation from the respirator: normal. . . .
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!